Supraorbital Keyhole Versus Pterional Approach: A Morphometric Anatomical Study.

OBJECTIVE

Although the supraorbital (SO) keyhole approach has a wide range of indications, its routine usefulness with the advance of current technology has not been fully evaluated. In an attempt to address this issue, a cadaveric morphometric analysis to the supra- and parasellar regions was performed, comparing the standard Pterional craniotomy (PT) with the SO keyhole.

METHODS

ETOH-fixed and silicone-injected human cadaveric heads were used. SO (n = 8) and PT craniotomies (n = 8) were performed. Pre- and post-dissection CT, along with pre-dissection MRI scans were also completed for neuro-navigation purposes, aimed to verify predetermined anatomical landmarks selected for morphometric analysis.

RESULTS

Notwithstanding the smaller craniotomy, the SO approach allowed optimal anatomical exposure when compared to the PT approach. With 30° of head rotation, the SO keyhole showed a wider surgical field of the suprasellar region.

CONCLUSIONS

Using detailed preoperative image-guided surgical planning, the SO keyhole approach offered an appropriate alternative route to the supra- and parasellar regions, compared to the PT craniotomy.