Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2490-2498. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14756-x. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) is recommended when lymph node metastasis is evident or strongly suspected on preoperative imaging studies, even for a completely resectable (cT1-2) tumor with minimal lymph node involvement (cN1). We evaluated the validity of upfront surgical approach in this patient group.
We retrospectively reviewed data from 247 patients with cT1-2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent upfront radical esophagectomy followed by the pathology-based adjuvant treatment. Oncologic outcomes of cN1 patients were compared with those of cN0 patients.
There were 203 cN0 and 44 cN1 patients. The lymph node yield was 62.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 51.0-76.0) in cN0 and 65.5 (IQR, 57.5-85.0) in cN1 patients (p = 0.033). The size of metastatic node was 0.6 cm (IQR, 0.4-0.9 cm) in cN0 and 0.8 cm (IQR, 0.5-1.3 cm) in cN1 patients (p = 0.001). Nodal upstaging was identified in 29.1% of cN0 and 40.9% of cN1 patients, whereas 18.2% of the cN1 had no actual lymph node metastasis (pN0). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was not significantly different between the groups (cN0, 74.4%; cN1, 71.8%; p = 0.529). Survival rates were closely correlated with pN stage, and a multivariate analysis revealed that pN2-3 stage was a risk factor for poor disease-free survival.
Upfront radical surgery provided accurate nodal staging information, potentially sparing some cN1 patients from unnecessary nCRT while demonstrating comparable survival rates. It might be a valid option for the treatment of cT1-2N1 ESCC.
新辅助放化疗(nCRT)推荐用于术前影像学检查显示或强烈怀疑淋巴结转移的病例,即使是完全可切除(cT1-2)、淋巴结受累最小(cN1)的肿瘤。我们评估了该策略在这组患者中的有效性。
我们回顾性分析了 247 例接受根治性食管切除术和基于病理的辅助治疗的 cT1-2 食管鳞癌(ESCC)患者的数据。比较了 cN1 患者和 cN0 患者的肿瘤学结局。
203 例 cN0 患者和 44 例 cN1 患者。cN0 患者的淋巴结获取量为 62.0(四分位距 [IQR],51.0-76.0),cN1 患者为 65.5(IQR,57.5-85.0)(p=0.033)。cN0 患者的转移淋巴结大小为 0.6 cm(IQR,0.4-0.9 cm),cN1 患者为 0.8 cm(IQR,0.5-1.3 cm)(p=0.001)。cN0 患者中有 29.1%发生了淋巴结分期上调,cN1 患者中有 40.9%发生了淋巴结分期上调,而 18.2%的 cN1 患者实际上没有淋巴结转移(pN0)。两组患者的 5 年无病生存率无显著差异(cN0,74.4%;cN1,71.8%;p=0.529)。生存率与 pN 分期密切相关,多因素分析显示 pN2-3 期是无病生存率差的危险因素。
根治性手术提供了准确的淋巴结分期信息,可能使一些 cN1 患者免于不必要的 nCRT,同时显示出可比较的生存率。对于治疗 cT1-2N1 ESCC,它可能是一种有效的治疗选择。