Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Ther Drug Monit. 2024 Jun 1;46(3):391-396. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001169. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
This study aimed to evaluate the concentrations of rilpivirine (RLP) and doravirine (DOR) after 3 days-off using simulations from population pharmacokinetics models.
The authors conducted a series of 500 sets of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to examine the steady-state conditions for 2 common dosage levels: 25 mg/d for RLP and 100 mg/d for DOR. These simulations were conducted under 2 scenarios: 1 without drug cessation and another after a 3-day break. The validity of the implementation was established through a comparison of median trough concentrations (C24h) with previously reported data. Subsequently, the proportion of simulated patients with C24h and C72h after 3 days-off (C72h/3do) that exceeded the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50), 5.2 mcg/L for DOR and 20.5 mcg/L for RLP respectively, was calculated. The inhibitory quotient (IQ) was also computed, which was 6 times IC50 for DOR and 4.5 times IC50 for RLP. Finally, nomograms were constructed to estimate the probability of having C72h/3do > IC50 or > IQ for different ranges of C24h.
Simulated C24h median ± SD for RLP were 61.8 ± 0.4 mcg/L and for DOR 397 ± 0 mcg/L. For RLP, 99.3 ± 0.1% exceeded IC50 at C24h, 16.4 ± 0.4% at C72h/3do, and none surpassed the IQ threshold. In contrast, DOR had 100% ± 0% above IC50 at C24h, 93.6 ± 0.2% at C72h/3do, and 58.6 ± 0.5% exceeded the IQ.
These findings suggest that treatment with DOR may offer a more forgiving therapeutic profile than RLP, given the larger proportion of patients achieving effective drug exposure with DOR. However, it is important to acknowledge a significant limitation of this study, namely, the assumption that drug concentration is a perfect surrogate for drug effectiveness.
本研究旨在通过群体药代动力学模型模拟,评估利匹韦林(RLP)和多伟拉韦(DOR)停药 3 天后的浓度。
作者进行了一系列 500 次、每次 10000 次的蒙特卡罗模拟,以检查两种常用剂量水平(RLP 每日 25mg 和 DOR 每日 100mg)的稳态条件。这两种模拟分别在两种情况下进行:一种是不停药,另一种是停药 3 天后。通过比较中值谷浓度(C24h)与先前报道的数据来验证实施的有效性。随后,计算了停药 3 天后(C72h/3do)模拟患者中 C24h 和 C72h 超过抑制浓度 50(IC50)的比例,即 DOR 为 5.2 mcg/L,RLP 为 20.5 mcg/L。同时还计算了抑制指数(IQ),即 DOR 为 IC50 的 6 倍,RLP 为 IC50 的 4.5 倍。最后,构建了列线图来估计不同 C24h 范围下 C72h/3do > IC50 或 > IQ 的概率。
模拟的 RLP 中值±SD 为 61.8±0.4 mcg/L,DOR 为 397±0 mcg/L。对于 RLP,99.3±0.1%在 C24h 时超过 IC50,16.4±0.4%在 C72h/3do 时超过 IC50,没有超过 IQ 阈值。相比之下,DOR 在 C24h 时 100%±0%超过 IC50,93.6±0.2%在 C72h/3do 时超过 IC50,58.6±0.5%超过 IQ。
这些发现表明,与 RLP 相比,DOR 治疗可能提供更宽松的治疗谱,因为 DOR 治疗的患者中有更大比例达到有效的药物暴露。然而,需要注意的是,这项研究存在一个显著的局限性,即假设药物浓度是药物有效性的完美替代物。