Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Neuromodulation. 2024 Jun;27(4):792-799. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
Epilepsy affects 1% to 2% of the global population, and those who are resistant to medical treatment may be candidates for neuromodulation. In select populations, brain stimulation approaches including deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are used. Although studies have shown that patients from Black, Hispanic, lower income, and rural communities have less access to epilepsy care and have lower rates of epilepsy surgery, disparities in the use of brain stimulation for epilepsy treatment are currently not known.
We queried the US National Inpatient Sample data base from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019 for all patients discharged with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Ninth Revision or ICD Tenth Revision diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy. Among these patients discharged, the rates of brain stimulation treatment, including DBS and RNS, were reported in each subgroup of race, ethnicity, and insurance. To generate national estimates, all analyses were weighted.
A total of 237,895 patients discharged with drug-resistant epilepsy were identified, of whom 4,925 (2.1%) received brain stimulation treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. Black patients (n = 420, 0.9%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% CI [0.40, 0.64]) were less likely to receive brain stimulation treatment than were White patients (n = 3300, 2.4%). There was no significant difference between Asian (n = 105, 2.3%, OR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.53, 1.33]) and Hispanic (n = 655, 2.6%, OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.77, 1.17]) patients and White patients. No significant difference was observed between female (n = 2515, 2.1%, OR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.89, 1.17]) and male (n = 2410, 2.0%) patients either. Patients with Medicare (n = 1150, 1.2%, OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.57, 0.84]) or Medicaid (n = 1150, 1.8%, OR = 0.52, 95% CI [0.44, 0.62]) were less likely to receive brain stimulation treatment than were those with private insurance as the primary payer (n = 2370, 3.9%).
We discovered significant disparities in the use of brain stimulation treatments for drug-resistant epilepsy based on race and insurance status. More research will be required to determine the cause of these disparities.
癫痫影响全球 1%至 2%的人口,那些对药物治疗有抗药性的人可能是神经调节的候选者。在特定人群中,包括深部脑刺激 (DBS) 和反应性神经刺激 (RNS) 在内的脑刺激方法被用于治疗癫痫。尽管研究表明,来自黑人、西班牙裔、低收入和农村社区的患者获得癫痫护理的机会较少,癫痫手术的比例较低,但目前尚不清楚在癫痫治疗中使用脑刺激的差异。
我们从 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,对美国国家住院患者样本数据库进行了查询,以获取所有出院时国际疾病分类 (ICD) 第九版或 ICD 第十版诊断为药物难治性癫痫的患者。在这些出院的患者中,报告了种族、族裔和保险的每个亚组中脑刺激治疗(包括 DBS 和 RNS)的比率。为了生成全国估计值,对所有分析进行了加权。
共确定了 237895 名出院时患有药物难治性癫痫的患者,其中 4925 名(2.1%)接受了脑刺激治疗药物难治性癫痫。黑人患者(n=420,0.9%,比值比[OR]0.51,95%CI [0.40,0.64])比白人患者(n=3300,2.4%)接受脑刺激治疗的可能性更小。亚洲患者(n=105,2.3%,OR=0.80,95%CI [0.53,1.33])和西班牙裔患者(n=655,2.6%,OR=0.95,95%CI [0.77,1.17])与白人患者之间无显著差异。女性患者(n=2515,2.1%,OR=1.02,95%CI [0.89,1.17])与男性患者(n=2410,2.0%)之间也无显著差异。医疗保险患者(n=1150,1.2%,OR=0.69,95%CI [0.57,0.84])或医疗补助患者(n=1150,1.8%,OR=0.52,95%CI [0.44,0.62])接受脑刺激治疗的可能性低于私人保险为主要支付者(n=2370,3.9%)的患者。
我们发现,基于种族和保险状况,在药物难治性癫痫的脑刺激治疗使用方面存在显著差异。需要进一步研究以确定这些差异的原因。