Suppr超能文献

广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)和共病 GAD 及抑郁症状的共享和独特的连接障碍模式。

Shared and distinctive dysconnectivity patterns underlying pure generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and comorbid GAD and depressive symptoms.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, National Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.

Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Feb;170:225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.12.031. Epub 2023 Dec 22.

Abstract

The resting-state connectivity features underlying pure generalized anxiety disorder (GAD, G1) and comorbid GAD and depressive symptoms (G2) have not been directly compared. Furthermore, it is unclear whether these features might serve as potential prognostic biomarkers and change with treatment. Degree centrality (DC) in G1 (40 subjects), G2 (58 subjects), and healthy controls (HCs, 54 subjects) was compared before treatment, and the DC of G1 or G2 at baseline was compared with that after 4 weeks of paroxetine treatment. Using support vector regression (SVR), voxel-wise DC across the entire brain and abnormal DC at baseline were employed to predict treatment response. At baseline, G1 and G2 exhibited lower DC in the left mid-cingulate cortex and vermis IV/V compared to HCs. Additionally, compared to HCs, G1 had lower DC in the left middle temporal gyrus, while G2 showed higher DC in the right inferior temporal/fusiform gyrus. However, there was no significant difference in DC between G1 and G2. The SVR based on abnormal DC at baseline could successfully predict treatment response in responders in G2 or in G1 and G2. Notably, the predictive performance based on abnormal DC at baseline surpassed that based on DC across the entire brain. After treatment, G2 responders showed lower DC in the right medial orbital frontal gyrus, while no change in DC was identified in G1 responders. The G1 and G2 showed common and distinct dysconnectivity patterns and they could potentially serve as prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, DC in patients with GAD could change with treatment.

摘要

静息态连接特征是潜在的预后生物标志物,且可能随治疗而改变。在治疗前,我们比较了单纯广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD,G1)和共病 GAD 和抑郁症状(G2)患者的脑区度中心度(degree centrality,DC),并比较了 G1 或 G2 患者的基线 DC 与帕罗西汀治疗 4 周后的 DC。采用支持向量回归(support vector regression,SVR),以全脑各脑区的 voxel-wise DC 和基线异常 DC 来预测治疗反应。结果发现,与健康对照组(HCs)相比,G1 和 G2 患者的左侧扣带回中部和蚓部 IV/V 的 DC 降低。此外,与 HCs 相比,G1 患者的左侧颞中回的 DC 降低,而 G2 患者的右侧颞下回/梭状回的 DC 升高。然而,G1 和 G2 之间的 DC 无显著差异。基于基线异常 DC 的 SVR 可成功预测 G2 或 G1 和 G2 中的应答者的治疗反应。值得注意的是,基于基线异常 DC 的预测性能优于基于全脑 DC 的预测性能。治疗后,G2 应答者的右侧眶额内侧回的 DC 降低,而 G1 应答者的 DC 无变化。G1 和 G2 表现出共同和独特的功能连接异常模式,它们可能作为预后生物标志物。此外,GAD 患者的 DC 可能随治疗而改变。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验