Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, National Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Feb;170:225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.12.031. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
The resting-state connectivity features underlying pure generalized anxiety disorder (GAD, G1) and comorbid GAD and depressive symptoms (G2) have not been directly compared. Furthermore, it is unclear whether these features might serve as potential prognostic biomarkers and change with treatment. Degree centrality (DC) in G1 (40 subjects), G2 (58 subjects), and healthy controls (HCs, 54 subjects) was compared before treatment, and the DC of G1 or G2 at baseline was compared with that after 4 weeks of paroxetine treatment. Using support vector regression (SVR), voxel-wise DC across the entire brain and abnormal DC at baseline were employed to predict treatment response. At baseline, G1 and G2 exhibited lower DC in the left mid-cingulate cortex and vermis IV/V compared to HCs. Additionally, compared to HCs, G1 had lower DC in the left middle temporal gyrus, while G2 showed higher DC in the right inferior temporal/fusiform gyrus. However, there was no significant difference in DC between G1 and G2. The SVR based on abnormal DC at baseline could successfully predict treatment response in responders in G2 or in G1 and G2. Notably, the predictive performance based on abnormal DC at baseline surpassed that based on DC across the entire brain. After treatment, G2 responders showed lower DC in the right medial orbital frontal gyrus, while no change in DC was identified in G1 responders. The G1 and G2 showed common and distinct dysconnectivity patterns and they could potentially serve as prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, DC in patients with GAD could change with treatment.
静息态连接特征是潜在的预后生物标志物,且可能随治疗而改变。在治疗前,我们比较了单纯广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD,G1)和共病 GAD 和抑郁症状(G2)患者的脑区度中心度(degree centrality,DC),并比较了 G1 或 G2 患者的基线 DC 与帕罗西汀治疗 4 周后的 DC。采用支持向量回归(support vector regression,SVR),以全脑各脑区的 voxel-wise DC 和基线异常 DC 来预测治疗反应。结果发现,与健康对照组(HCs)相比,G1 和 G2 患者的左侧扣带回中部和蚓部 IV/V 的 DC 降低。此外,与 HCs 相比,G1 患者的左侧颞中回的 DC 降低,而 G2 患者的右侧颞下回/梭状回的 DC 升高。然而,G1 和 G2 之间的 DC 无显著差异。基于基线异常 DC 的 SVR 可成功预测 G2 或 G1 和 G2 中的应答者的治疗反应。值得注意的是,基于基线异常 DC 的预测性能优于基于全脑 DC 的预测性能。治疗后,G2 应答者的右侧眶额内侧回的 DC 降低,而 G1 应答者的 DC 无变化。G1 和 G2 表现出共同和独特的功能连接异常模式,它们可能作为预后生物标志物。此外,GAD 患者的 DC 可能随治疗而改变。