Vuppaladadiyam Sai Sree Varsha, Vuppaladadiyam Arun K, Sahoo Abhisek, Urgunde Ajay, Murugavelh S, Šrámek Vít, Pohořelý Michael, Trakal Lukáš, Bhattacharya Sankar, Sarmah Ajit K, Shah Kalpit, Pant Kamal K
Department of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 25;913:169436. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169436. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
Due to the 'forever' degrading nature of plastic waste, plastic waste management is often complicated. The applications of plastic are ubiquitous and inevitable in many scenarios. Current global waste plastics production is ca. 3.5 MMT per year, and with the current trend, plastic waste production will reach 25,000 MMT by 2040. However, the rapid growth in plastic manufacture and the material's inherent nature resulted in the accumulation of a vast amount of plastic garbage. The current recycling rate is <10 %, while the large volumes of discarded plastic waste cause environmental and ecological problems. Recycling rates for plastic vary widely by region and type of plastic. In some developed countries, the recycling rate for plastics is around 20-30 %, while in many developing nations, it is much lower. These statistics highlight the magnitude of the plastic waste problem and the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to manage plastic waste more effectively and reduce its impact on the environment. This review critically analyses past studies on the essential and efficient techniques for turning plastic trash into treasure. Additionally, an attempt has been made to provide a comprehensive understanding of the plastic upcycling process, the 3Rs policy, and the life-cycle assessment (LCA) of plastic conversion. The review advocates pyrolysis as one of the most promising methods of turning plastic trash into valuable chemicals. In addition, plastic waste management can be severely impacted due to uncontrollable events, such as Covid 19 pandemic. Recycling and chemical upcycling can certainly bring value to the end-of-life plastic. However, the LCA analysis indicated there is still a huge scope for innovation in chemical upcycling area compared to mechanical recycling. The formulation of policies and heightened public participation could play a pivotal role in reducing the environmental repercussions of plastic waste and facilitating a shift towards a more sustainable future.
由于塑料垃圾具有“永久性”降解的特性,塑料垃圾管理往往很复杂。塑料在许多场景中的应用无处不在且不可避免。目前全球每年的废塑料产量约为350万吨,按照当前趋势,到2040年塑料垃圾产量将达到2.5亿吨。然而,塑料制造的快速增长以及该材料的固有特性导致了大量塑料垃圾的堆积。目前的回收率低于10%,而大量废弃塑料垃圾造成了环境和生态问题。塑料的回收率因地区和塑料类型而异。在一些发达国家,塑料回收率约为20%-30%,而在许多发展中国家,回收率要低得多。这些统计数据凸显了塑料垃圾问题的严重性,以及迫切需要制定全面战略,以更有效地管理塑料垃圾并减少其对环境的影响。本综述批判性地分析了过去关于将塑料垃圾变废为宝的关键和有效技术的研究。此外,还试图全面了解塑料升级再造过程、3R政策以及塑料转化的生命周期评估(LCA)。该综述提倡热解是将塑料垃圾转化为有价值化学品最有前景的方法之一。此外,诸如新冠疫情等不可控事件可能会严重影响塑料垃圾管理。回收利用和化学升级再造肯定能为报废塑料带来价值。然而,生命周期评估分析表明,与机械回收相比,化学升级再造领域仍有很大的创新空间。政策制定和公众参与度的提高对于减少塑料垃圾的环境影响以及推动向更可持续未来的转变可能发挥关键作用。