1Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
2Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Angers, France; and.
Neurosurg Focus. 2024 Jan;56(1):E14. doi: 10.3171/2023.10.FOCUS23620.
Neuroanatomy comprehension is a keystone of understanding intracranial surgeries. Traditionally taught to students during ex cathedra courses, neuroanatomy is described as complex. Mixed reality (MxR) opens new perspectives in the learning process. This study aims to compare MxR-based courses with traditional ex cathedra lectures for neuroanatomy education.
Two lectures describing the neuroanatomy of the anterior circulation arteries ("Vascular Lecture" [VS]) and important white matter fiber tracts ("White Fibers Lecture" [WF]) were designed and delivered in ex cathedra and MxR-based formats with the same audio content. Ninety-one medical students were randomly assigned to group A (ex cathedra WF/MxR VS) or group B (MxR WF/ex cathedra VS). The MxR content was delivered via MxR goggles. Prior to each lecture, students took a 10-item multiple choice question (MCQ) pretest. After the lectures, students took a 20-item MCQ posttest (75% neuroanatomy, 25% clinical correlation).
The pretest scores showed no statistical difference between groups. Median posttest scores increased by 14.3% after using the MxR-based format compared to the ex cathedra format (16.00 [13.0, 18.0] vs 14.0 [11.0, 17.0], respectively, p < 0.01). Regarding the VS, students scored 21.7% better using the MxR format compared to the ex cathedra format (14.0 [12.0, 16.0] vs 11.5 [10.0, 14.0], p < 0.001). Concerning the WF, the median score using MxR was 18.0 (17.0, 19.0), and the median score using the ex cathedra format was 17.0 (16.0, 18.0; p < 0.01). Students showed high motivation to learn neuroanatomy in the future using MxR (74%) rather than ex cathedra format (25%; p < 0.001). Mild discomfort using the MxR goggles was reported by 48.3% of participants. Most participants (95.5%) preferred the MxR-based teaching.
Students acquired a better knowledge of the anatomy of the anterior circulation arteries and white fiber tracts using MxR-based teaching as compared to the standard ex cathedra format. The perception of lecture quality and learning motivation was better using MxR-based teaching despite some mild discomfort. The development of MxR-based solutions is promising to improve neuroanatomy education.
神经解剖学理解是理解颅内手术的关键。传统上,神经解剖学是在演讲课上向学生传授的,被描述为复杂的。混合现实(MxR)为学习过程开辟了新的视角。本研究旨在比较基于 MxR 的课程与传统的演讲课在神经解剖学教育方面的效果。
设计了两次讲座,分别描述了前循环动脉的神经解剖学(“血管讲座”[VS])和重要的白质纤维束(“白纤维讲座”[WF]),并以相同的音频内容以演讲和基于 MxR 的格式进行了讲授。91 名医学生被随机分配到 A 组(演讲 WF/MxR VS)或 B 组(MxR WF/演讲 VS)。在每次讲座之前,学生都要参加一个 10 项选择题(MCQ)的前测。讲座结束后,学生参加了一个 20 项 MCQ 的后测(75%神经解剖学,25%临床相关性)。
前测分数显示两组之间没有统计学差异。与传统的演讲课相比,使用基于 MxR 的格式后,后测分数中位数提高了 14.3%(16.00[13.0,18.0]与 14.00[11.0,17.0],p<0.01)。关于 VS,学生使用 MxR 格式的得分比演讲课高 21.7%(14.00[12.0,16.0]与 11.50[10.0,14.0],p<0.001)。关于 WF,使用 MxR 的中位数评分为 18.0(17.0,19.0),使用演讲课的中位数评分为 17.0(16.0,18.0;p<0.01)。学生表示,未来使用 MxR 学习神经解剖学的动机很高(74%),而不是演讲课(25%;p<0.001)。48.3%的参与者报告使用 MxR 护目镜有轻度不适。大多数参与者(95.5%)更喜欢基于 MxR 的教学。
与传统的演讲课相比,学生使用基于 MxR 的教学方法更好地掌握了前循环动脉和白质纤维束的解剖结构。尽管存在一些轻度不适,但基于 MxR 的教学在讲座质量和学习动机方面的感知更好。开发基于 MxR 的解决方案有望改善神经解剖学教育。