Suppr超能文献

一项随机、盲法、安慰剂对照、前瞻性临床研究,旨在评估在接受腹中线剖腹术的犬中使用稀释的脂质体包封布比卡因悬浮液的有效性。

A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, prospective clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of a diluted liposomal-encapsulated bupivacaine suspension in dogs undergoing a ventral midline celiotomy.

机构信息

Chesapeake Veterinary Surgical Specialists, 808 Bestgate Road, Annapolis, Maryland 21401, USA.

出版信息

Can Vet J. 2024 Jan;65(1):59-65.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a liposomal-encapsulated bupivacaine suspension (LEBS; Nocita), at a 1:5 dilution with 0.9% NaCl, for the reduction of postoperative pain scores and a related reduction in the need for postoperative opioids in dogs undergoing ventral midline celiotomy.

HYPOTHESIS

When infused at a 1:5 dilution, LEBS results in less postoperative pain (as indicated by pain scale scores), and a reduction in postoperative opioids, in dogs undergoing ventral midline celiotomy. The use of LEBS does not affect wound healing when compared to placebo.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized, blinded, prospective clinical trial.

ANIMALS

We studied 40 client-owned dogs undergoing abdominal surgery a ventral midline celiotomy.

PROCEDURE

Dogs undergoing a ventral midline celiotomy were enrolled and randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: those receiving LEBS or a placebo injection protocol into tissue planes during closure. The Glasgow Composite Pain Scale-Short Form (GCPS-SF) was used by an observer blinded to the treatment group to assess patients at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, and 72 h after extubation. Dogs with a score of ≥ 3 in any single category or ≥ 6 total were given a rescue analgesia. Data were analyzed to compare the number of rescue therapy doses administered between the 2 treatment groups.

RESULTS

Forty dogs completed the study. Dogs that received a diluted LEBS protocol were equally likely to require a rescue therapy as those that received the placebo (0.9% NaCl). There were no significant difference in the pain scores or the total number of opioid injections required between the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In dogs undergoing ventral midline celiotomy, 1:5 diluted LEBS administration alone should not be considered the sole method of pain relief. Liposomal-encapsulated bupivacaine suspension should be used in conjunction with systemic opioids as part of a multimodal analgesic regime. This multimodal approach would allow a reduction in dose or frequency of opioids, therefore lessening the undesired side effects associated with opioids while also decreasing client costs.

摘要

目的

评估 1:5 稀释浓度的包载布比卡因脂质体悬液(LEBS;Nocita)用于减少接受腹中线切开术的犬术后疼痛评分和相关阿片类药物需求的效果。

假设

以 1:5 的稀释度输注时,LEBS 可降低接受腹中线切开术的犬的术后疼痛(如疼痛评分所示)并减少术后阿片类药物的使用。与安慰剂相比,LEBS 的使用不会影响伤口愈合。

研究设计

这是一项随机、盲法、前瞻性临床试验。

动物

我们研究了 40 只接受腹部手术(腹中线切开术)的患犬。

操作程序

接受腹中线切开术的犬被纳入并随机分配到 2 组中的 1 组:在关闭时接受 LEBS 或安慰剂注射方案的组织平面。由对治疗组不知情的观察者使用格拉斯哥复合疼痛量表-简短形式(GCPS-SF)评估患者在拔管后 0、1、2、6、12、18、24、30、36、42、48、54、60、66 和 72 h 的疼痛。任何单一类别得分≥3 或总分≥6 的犬均给予解救镇痛。分析数据以比较 2 种治疗组之间给予的解救治疗剂量数。

结果

40 只犬完成了研究。接受稀释 LEBS 方案的犬与接受安慰剂(0.9%NaCl)的犬同样需要解救治疗。2 种治疗组之间的疼痛评分或所需阿片类药物注射总数无显著差异。

结论和临床相关性

在接受腹中线切开术的犬中,单独使用 1:5 稀释 LEBS 不应被视为唯一的镇痛方法。脂质体包载布比卡因悬浮液应与全身阿片类药物联合使用,作为多模式镇痛方案的一部分。这种多模式方法可以减少阿片类药物的剂量或频率,从而减轻与阿片类药物相关的不良副作用,同时降低客户成本。

相似文献

4
Liposomal bupivacaine infiltration at the surgical site for the management of postoperative pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD011419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011419.pub2.
5
Liposomal bupivacaine peripheral nerve block for the management of postoperative pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 25;2016(8):CD011476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011476.pub2.
6
Ketorolac for postoperative pain in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 7;7(7):CD012294. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012294.pub2.
8
Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3.
9
Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006120.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
An extended release local anaesthetic: potential for future use in veterinary surgical patients?
Vet Med Sci. 2016 Aug 23;2(4):229-238. doi: 10.1002/vms3.43. eCollection 2016 Nov.
3
The safety of liposome bupivacaine following various routes of administration in animals.
J Pain Res. 2015 Oct 30;8:781-9. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S85424. eCollection 2015.
4
Prescription of perioperative analgesics by UK small animal veterinary surgeons in 2013.
Vet Rec. 2015 May 9;176(19):493. doi: 10.1136/vr.102834. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
5
Procedure-specific pain management and outcome strategies.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;28(2):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 May 9.
6
7
Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;9(2):205-13. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.036.
8
Development of a behaviour-based scale to measure acute pain in dogs.
Vet Rec. 2001 Apr 28;148(17):525-31. doi: 10.1136/vr.148.17.525.
9
Bactericidal activity of preservative-free bupivacaine on microorganisms in the human skin flora.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Oct;42(9):1096-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05383.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验