From the Autonomous Reanimation and Evacuation Research Program, The Geneva Foundation, San Antonio, Texas.
Bioengineering Division, Draper, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
ASAIO J. 2024 Jun 1;70(6):535-544. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002127. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
Microfluidic membrane oxygenators are designed to mimic branching vasculature of the native lung during extracorporeal lung support. To date, scaling of such devices to achieve clinically relevant blood flow and lung support has been a limitation. We evaluated a novel multilayer microfluidic blood oxygenator (BLOx) capable of supporting 750-800 ml/min blood flow versus a standard hollow fiber membrane oxygenator (HFMO) in vivo during veno-venous extracorporeal life support for 24 hours in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated uninjured swine (n = 3/group). The objective was to assess feasibility, safety, and biocompatibility. Circuits remained patent and operated with stable pressures throughout 24 hours. No group differences in vital signs or evidence of end-organ damage occurred. No change in plasma free hemoglobin and von Willebrand factor multimer size distribution were observed. Platelet count decreased in BLOx at 6 hours (37% dec, P = 0.03), but not in HFMO; however, thrombin generation potential was elevated in HFMO (596 ± 81 nM·min) versus BLOx (323 ± 39 nM·min) at 24 hours ( P = 0.04). Other coagulation and inflammatory mediator results were unremarkable. BLOx required higher mechanical ventilator settings and showed lower gas transfer efficiency versus HFMO, but the stable device performance indicates that this technology is ready for further performance scaling and testing in lung injury models and during longer use conditions.
微流控膜式氧合器旨在模拟体外肺支持期间天然肺的分支血管结构。迄今为止,此类设备的缩放以实现临床相关的血流和肺支持一直是一个限制。我们评估了一种新型的多层微流控血液氧合器 (BLOx),与标准的空心纤维膜式氧合器 (HFMO) 相比,它能够在麻醉、机械通气的未受伤猪的静脉-静脉体外生命支持中支持 750-800ml/min 的血流,持续 24 小时(每组 n = 3)。目的是评估可行性、安全性和生物相容性。在 24 小时内,回路保持通畅且压力稳定。生命体征或终末器官损伤的证据在各组之间没有差异。未观察到血浆游离血红蛋白和血管性血友病因子多聚体大小分布的变化。在 BLOx 中,血小板计数在 6 小时时下降(37%下降,P = 0.03),但在 HFMO 中没有下降;然而,在 24 小时时,HFMO 中的凝血酶生成潜力升高(596±81 nM·min)与 BLOx(323±39 nM·min)相比(P = 0.04)。其他凝血和炎症介质结果无明显差异。BLOx 需要更高的机械呼吸机设置,并且与 HFMO 相比气体转移效率较低,但稳定的设备性能表明,该技术已经准备好进一步进行性能缩放和在肺损伤模型以及更长使用条件下进行测试。