Institute of Statistical Research and Training (ISRT), University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0290746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290746. eCollection 2024.
In developing nations, catastrophic health expenditures have become an all-too-common occurrence, threatening to push households into impoverishment and poverty. By analyzing the Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2016, which features a sample of 46,080 households, this study provides a comprehensive district-by-district analysis of the variation in household catastrophic health expenditures and related factors. The study utilizes a multilevel logistic regression model, which considers both fixed and random effects to identify factors associated with catastrophic health expenditure. The findings of the study indicate that districts located in the eastern and southern regions are at a significantly higher risk of experiencing catastrophic health expenditures. A potential explanation for this trend may be attributed to the high prevalence of chronic diseases in these districts, as well as their economic conditions. The presence of chronic diseases (AOR 5.45 with 95% CI: 5.14, 5.77), presence of old age person (AOR 1.50 with 95% CI: 1.39, 1.61), place of residence (AOR 1.40 with 95% CI: 1.14, 1.73) are found to be highly associated factors. Additionally, the study reveals that the thresholds used to define catastrophic health expenditures exhibit substantial variation across different regions, and differ remarkably from the threshold established by the WHO. On average, the thresholds are 23.12% of nonfood expenditure and 12.14% of total expenditure. In light of these findings, this study offers important insights for policymakers and stakeholders working towards achieving universal health coverage and sustainable development goals in Bangladesh.
在发展中国家,灾难性卫生支出已变得极为常见,有可能使家庭陷入贫困。本研究通过分析 2016 年家庭收入和支出调查,该调查采用了 46080 户家庭的样本,对家庭灾难性卫生支出及其相关因素的地区差异进行了全面的分析。本研究采用了多层次逻辑回归模型,同时考虑固定效应和随机效应,以确定与灾难性卫生支出相关的因素。研究结果表明,位于东部和南部地区的地区面临更高的灾难性卫生支出风险。这种趋势的一个可能解释是,这些地区慢性疾病的高发率以及其经济状况。存在慢性疾病(AOR5.45,95%CI:5.14,5.77)、存在老年人(AOR1.50,95%CI:1.39,1.61)、居住地(AOR1.40,95%CI:1.14,1.73)被发现是高度相关的因素。此外,研究表明,用于定义灾难性卫生支出的阈值在不同地区存在显著差异,且与世界卫生组织(WHO)设定的阈值差异显著。平均而言,阈值为非食品支出的 23.12%和总支出的 12.14%。鉴于这些发现,本研究为孟加拉国实现全民健康覆盖和可持续发展目标的政策制定者和利益相关者提供了重要的见解。