• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国药品自付支出:2016-17 年国家家庭收支调查分析。

Out-of-pocket expenditure on medicines in Bangladesh: An analysis of the national household income and expenditure survey 2016-17.

机构信息

Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Global Development Policy Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 16;17(9):e0274671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274671. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0274671
PMID:36112592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9480983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPE) increases the probability that households will become impoverished or will forgo needed care. The aim of this paper is to study household medicines expenditure and its associated determining factors to develop policies to protect households from financial hardship.

METHODS

The present cross-sectional and population-level study used the Bangladesh 2016-17 National Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES). The final sample size was 46,080 households. We analyzed the probability of OOPE for medicines, the share of total OOPE due to medicines out of total OOPE in health (reported as a ratio between zero and one), the OOPE amount for medicines reported (in United States Dollars), and the share of OOPE amount on medicines out of total household expenditure (reported as a ratio between zero and one). Predictors of analyzed outcomes were identified using three regression models.

RESULTS

Out of those households who spent on healthcare, the probability of having any OOPE on medicines was 87.9%. Of those who spent on medicines, the median monthly expenditure was US$3.03. The poorest households spent 9.97% of their total household expenditure as OOPE on medicines, nearly double that of the wealthiest households (5.86%). The characteristic which showed the most significant correlation to a high OOPE on medicines was the presence of chronic diseases, especially cancer. Twenty six percent of all surveyed households spend more than 10% of their OOPE on medicines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that financial protection should be targeted at the poorest quintiles and such protection should include enrollment of rural households. Further, outpatient medicines benefits should include those for non-communicable diseases (NCDs).

摘要

背景和目的

自付费用过高(OOPE)增加了家庭贫困或放弃必要医疗的可能性。本文旨在研究家庭药品支出及其相关决定因素,制定保护家庭免受经济困难的政策。

方法

本横断面和人群水平研究使用了孟加拉国 2016-17 年国家家庭收入和支出调查(HIES)。最终样本量为 46080 户家庭。我们分析了药品 OOPE 的可能性、药品总 OOPE 占药品总 OOPE 的比例(报告为零到一之间的比值)、报告的药品 OOPE 金额(以美元计)以及药品 OOPE 金额占家庭总支出的比例(报告为零到一之间的比值)。使用三个回归模型确定分析结果的预测因素。

结果

在那些在医疗保健上有支出的家庭中,有药品 OOPE 的家庭占 87.9%。在那些有药品支出的家庭中,每月支出中位数为 3.03 美元。最贫困家庭的药品总支出占家庭总支出的 9.97%,几乎是最富裕家庭的两倍(5.86%)。与高药品 OOPE 相关性最大的特征是存在慢性病,尤其是癌症。26%的被调查家庭将超过 10%的 OOPE 用于药品。

结论

我们的研究表明,财务保护应针对最贫困的五分之一人口,并且这种保护应包括农村家庭的参保。此外,门诊药品福利应包括非传染性疾病(NCDs)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/9480983/e132d12a004b/pone.0274671.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/9480983/e132d12a004b/pone.0274671.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/9480983/e132d12a004b/pone.0274671.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Out-of-pocket expenditure on medicines in Bangladesh: An analysis of the national household income and expenditure survey 2016-17.孟加拉国药品自付支出:2016-17 年国家家庭收支调查分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 16;17(9):e0274671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274671. eCollection 2022.
2
Probability and amount of medicines expenditure according to health insurance status in Kenya: A household survey in eight counties.肯尼亚基于健康保险状况的药品支出概率和数量:8 个县的家庭调查。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Mar;37(2):725-733. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3368. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
Out-of-pocket expenditure on childhood infections and its financial burden on Indian households: Evidence from nationally representative household survey (2017-18).儿童传染病的自付费用及其对印度家庭的经济负担:来自全国代表性家庭调查(2017-18 年)的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 27;17(12):e0278025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278025. eCollection 2022.
4
Disease-specific distress healthcare financing and catastrophic out-of-pocket expenditure for hospitalization in Bangladesh.孟加拉国特定疾病困扰、医疗保健融资以及住院灾难性自付支出
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Aug 20;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01712-6.
5
Heterogeneous effects of health insurance on out-of-pocket expenditure on medicines in Mexico.医疗保险对墨西哥药品自付支出的异质影响。
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):593-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
6
Assessing the household economic burden of non-communicable diseases in India: evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys.评估印度非传染性疾病的家庭经济负担:来自重复横断面调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 7;21(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10828-3.
7
Can health insurance protect against out-of-pocket and catastrophic expenditures and also support poverty reduction? Evidence from Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.医疗保险能否防范自付费用和灾难性支出并助力减贫?来自加纳国家医疗保险计划的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jul 22;15(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0401-1.
8
The effectiveness of a government-sponsored health protection scheme in reducing financial risks for the below-poverty-line population in Bangladesh.一项政府资助的健康保护计划在降低孟加拉国贫困线以下人口经济风险方面的成效。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Mar 12;39(3):281-298. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad115.
9
Does equity in healthcare spending exist among Indian states? Explaining regional variations from national sample survey data.印度各邦之间是否存在医疗支出公平性?基于全国抽样调查数据解释地区差异。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 14;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0517-y.
10
Out-of-pocket expenditure for hypertension care: a population-based study in low-income urban Medellin, Colombia.高血压治疗的自付费用:哥伦比亚麦德林低收入城市的一项基于人群的研究。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1806527. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1806527.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmet healthcare needs, out-of-pocket payments and catastrophic health expenditures among hypertensive adults in Bangladesh.孟加拉国高血压成年患者未满足的医疗需求、自付费用及灾难性医疗支出
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 16;25(1):1088. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13121-w.
2
Household healthcare expenditure: A cross-sectional analysis of urban and rural Puducherry, South India.家庭医疗保健支出:印度南部本地治里城乡的横断面分析
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2458-2483. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1944_24. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
3
Assessing the determinants of out-of-pocket health expenditures among Cambodian households in informal employment using survey data.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing data and methodological limitations in estimating catastrophic health spending and impoverishment in India, 2004-18.解决印度 2004-18 年估算灾难性卫生支出和贫困的数据分析和方法学局限性。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01421-6.
2
Financial toxicity of cancer treatment: Moving the discussion from acknowledgement of the problem to identifying solutions.癌症治疗的经济毒性:将讨论从对问题的认识转向寻找解决方案。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jan 31;20:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100269. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Disease-specific out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in urban Bangladesh: A Bayesian analysis.
利用调查数据评估柬埔寨非正规就业家庭自付医疗费用的决定因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 31;24(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02394-6.
4
"": Out-of-Pocket Expenditure on Healthcare and the Preference for Private Healthcare Providers in South India.“”: 印度南部的医疗保健自付支出与对私立医疗保健提供者的偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 26;21(10):1287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101287.
5
SARS-CoV-2 Variants and COVID-19 in Bangladesh-Lessons Learned.孟加拉国的 SARS-CoV-2 变异株和 COVID-19:经验教训。
Viruses. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):1077. doi: 10.3390/v16071077.
6
From the local disparities to national realities: Mapping and multilevel modeling of catastrophic health expenditure in Bangladesh using HIES 2016.从地方差异到国家现实:基于 2016 年 HIES 的孟加拉国灾难性卫生支出的制图和多层次建模。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0290746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290746. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring barriers to accessing healthcare services for older indigenous people in the Chittagong Hill Tract, Bangladesh.探索孟加拉国吉大港山区老年原住民获得医疗服务的障碍。
AIMS Public Health. 2023 Aug 10;10(3):678-697. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023047. eCollection 2023.
孟加拉国城市特定疾病自付医疗支出:贝叶斯分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 14;15(1):e0227565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227565. eCollection 2020.
4
Evaluating medicine prices, availability and affordability in Bangladesh using World Health Organisation and Health Action International methodology.使用世界卫生组织和国际卫生行动组织的方法评估孟加拉国的药品价格、可及性和可负担性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4221-z.
5
Out-of-Pocket Payments, Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Poverty Among Households in Nigeria 2010.尼日利亚 2010 年家庭自付支出、灾难性卫生支出和贫困状况
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Sep 1;7(9):798-806. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.19.
6
Financial protection analysis in eight countries in the WHO South-East Asia Region.八个世卫组织东南亚区域国家的财务保护分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Sep 1;96(9):610-620E. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.209858. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Financing health care in Bangladesh: Policy responses and challenges towards achieving universal health coverage.孟加拉国的医疗保健融资:实现全民健康覆盖的政策应对和挑战。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e11-e20. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2666. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
The role of national health insurance for achieving UHC in the Philippines: a mixed methods analysis.菲律宾国家医疗保险在实现全民健康覆盖中的作用:一项混合方法分析。
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1483638. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1483638.
9
Measuring financial protection against catastrophic health expenditures: methodological challenges for global monitoring.衡量针对灾难性卫生支出的财务保护:全球监测的方法学挑战。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 31;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0749-5.
10
Economics of Cancer Medicines: For Whose Benefit?癌症药物经济学:造福于谁?
New Bioeth. 2017 Apr;23(1):95-104. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2017.1314885.