Department of Behavioural Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1111, NO-0317, Oslo, Norway.
Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05402-7.
Veterinarians are an occupational group with an increased suicide risk. Euthanasing animals may influence both veterinarians' views on assisted dying in humans and their suicide risk. We investigated (I) attitudes towards assisted dying, (II) whether the field of work and the frequency of euthanasing animals were associated with positive attitudes towards human euthanasia, and (III) whether frequently euthanasing animals was associated with serious suicidal thoughts.
We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study among veterinarians in Norway (response rate: 75%). Logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios for both positive attitudes towards human euthanasia and serious suicidal thoughts. The analyses were adjusted for socio-demographic and work-related factors.
Fifty-five percent of the veterinarians agreed that euthanasia should be permitted for humans with a fatal disease and short life expectancy. Working with companion animals was independently associated with positive attitudes towards human euthanasia (OR = 1.66 (95% CI: 1.23-2.23)), while veterinarians' frequency of euthanasing animals was not. Frequency of euthanasing animals was independently associated with serious suicidal thoughts, OR = 2.56 (95% CI: 1.35-4.87).
Veterinarians' attitudes towards assisted dying in humans did not differ from those of the general population. Veterinarians' frequency of euthanasing animals was not associated with positive attitudes towards euthanasia in humans. However, veterinarians working in companion animal practices were more likely to have positive attitudes towards euthanasia in humans. Moreover, euthanising animals five times or more a week was associated with serious suicidal thoughts. We need more research to infer about causality in these findings.
兽医是自杀风险较高的职业群体。对动物实施安乐死可能会影响兽医对人类辅助死亡的看法及其自杀风险。我们调查了(I)对辅助死亡的态度,(II)工作领域和实施安乐死动物的频率是否与对人类安乐死的积极态度相关,以及(III)频繁实施安乐死动物是否与严重自杀念头相关。
我们在挪威对兽医进行了一项全国性的横断面研究(应答率:75%)。使用逻辑回归模型计算了对人类安乐死的积极态度和严重自杀念头的优势比。分析调整了社会人口统计学和工作相关因素。
55%的兽医同意对于患有致命疾病且预期寿命较短的人,应允许实施安乐死。与伴侣动物一起工作与对人类安乐死的积极态度独立相关(OR=1.66(95%CI:1.23-2.23)),而兽医实施安乐死动物的频率则不然。实施安乐死动物的频率与严重自杀念头独立相关,OR=2.56(95%CI:1.35-4.87)。
兽医对人类辅助死亡的态度与普通人群没有区别。兽医实施安乐死动物的频率与对人类安乐死的积极态度无关。然而,从事伴侣动物实践的兽医更有可能对人类安乐死持积极态度。此外,每周实施安乐死动物 5 次或更多次与严重自杀念头相关。我们需要更多的研究来推断这些发现中的因果关系。