Suppr超能文献

熟练骨盆运动训练能否改变背部肌肉皮质运动控制?单脉冲和双脉冲经颅磁刺激的比较。

Can training of a skilled pelvic movement change corticomotor control of back muscles? Comparison of single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

机构信息

NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland.

Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et integration sociale (CIRRIS), Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Jul;56(1):3705-3719. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15683. Epub 2022 May 10.

Abstract

Evidence suggests excitability of the motor cortex (M1) changes in response to motor skill learning of the upper limb. Few studies have examined immediate changes in corticospinal excitability and intra-cortical mechanisms following motor learning in the lower back. Further, it is unknown which transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigms are likely to reveal changes in cortical function in this region. This study aimed to (1) compare corticospinal excitability and intra-cortical mechanisms in the lower back region of M1 before and after a single session of lumbopelvic tilt motor learning task in healthy people and (2) compare these measures between two TMS coils and two methods of recruitment curve (RC) acquisition. Twenty-eight young participants (23.6 ± 4.6 years) completed a lumbopelvic tilting task involving three 5-min blocks. Single-pulse (RC from 70% to 150% of active motor threshold) and paired-pulse TMS measures (ICF, SICF and SICI) were undertaken before (using 2 coils: figure-of-8 and double cone) and after (using double cone coil only) training. RCs were also acquired using a traditional and rapid method. A significant increase in corticospinal excitability was found after training as measured by RC intensities, but this was not related to the RC slope. No significant differences were found for paired-pulse measures after training. Finally, there was good agreement between RC parameters when measured with the two different TMS coils or different acquisition methods (traditional vs. rapid). Changes in corticospinal excitability after a single session of lumbopelvic motor learning task are seen, but these changes are not explained by changes in intra-cortical mechanisms.

摘要

证据表明,运动皮层(M1)的兴奋性会因上肢运动技能的学习而改变。很少有研究探讨过下背部运动学习后皮质脊髓兴奋性和皮质内机制的即时变化。此外,尚不清楚哪种经颅磁刺激(TMS)范式可能揭示该区域皮质功能的变化。本研究旨在:(1)比较健康人单次腰骶倾斜运动学习任务前后 M1 下背部皮质脊髓兴奋性和皮质内机制;(2)比较两种 TMS 线圈和两种募集曲线(RC)采集方法的这些测量值。28 名年轻参与者(23.6±4.6 岁)完成了涉及三个 5 分钟块的腰骶倾斜任务。在训练前(使用 2 个线圈:八字形和双锥形)和训练后(仅使用双锥形线圈)进行单脉冲(RC 从 70%到 150%的主动运动阈值)和双脉冲 TMS 测量(ICF、SICF 和 SICI)。还使用传统和快速方法获取 RC。RC 强度测量发现,训练后皮质脊髓兴奋性显著增加,但与 RC 斜率无关。训练后,双脉冲测量无显著差异。最后,当使用两种不同的 TMS 线圈或不同的采集方法(传统方法与快速方法)测量 RC 参数时,两者之间具有良好的一致性。单次腰骶部运动学习任务后,皮质脊髓兴奋性发生变化,但这些变化不能用皮质内机制的变化来解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a83b/9540878/c67f57ab2fc1/EJN-56-3705-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验