Perrier Rémi, Schawe Hendrik, Hernández Laura
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modélisation, UMR-8089 CNRS, CY Cergy Paris Université, Cergy-Pontoise, France.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50463-z.
We present an extensive study of the joint effects of heterogeneous social agents and their heterogeneous social links in a bounded confidence opinion dynamics model. The full phase diagram of the model is explored for two different network's topologies and compared to two opposed extreme cases: on one hand, the heterogeneous agents constitute a mixed population and on the other, their interactions are modeled by a lattice. The results show that when agents prone to compromise coexist with close-minded ones, the steady state of the dynamics shows coexistent phases. In particular, unlike the case of homogeneous agents in networks, or heterogeneous agents in a fully mixed population, it is possible that the society ends up in consensus around one extreme opinion. Moreover, during the dynamics, the consensus may be overturned from one extreme to the other of the opinion space. We also show that the standard order parameter, the normalized average size of the largest opinion cluster, may be misleading in this case, as it hides the existence of these phases. The phase where the opinion of the society is overturned does not require the presence of agents with special characteristics, (stubborn, extremists, etc.); it results from the interplay of agents which have agreed on an extreme opinion with the remaining group that holds the opposite one. Among the former, some may be prone to compromise with other agents which are out of the majority group, these agents, according to their location in the network, may act like bridges between the two groups and slowly attract the whole society to the other extreme.
我们在有界置信度意见动态模型中,对异质社会主体及其异质社会联系的联合效应进行了广泛研究。针对两种不同的网络拓扑结构,探索了该模型的完整相图,并与两种相反的极端情况进行了比较:一方面,异质主体构成混合群体;另一方面,它们的相互作用由晶格建模。结果表明,当倾向于妥协的主体与思想封闭的主体共存时,动态过程的稳态呈现出共存阶段。特别是,与网络中同质主体的情况不同,或者与完全混合群体中的异质主体情况不同,社会最终有可能围绕一种极端意见达成共识。此外,在动态过程中,共识可能会在意见空间的一个极端与另一个极端之间被推翻。我们还表明,在这种情况下,标准序参量(最大意见簇的归一化平均规模)可能会产生误导,因为它掩盖了这些阶段的存在。社会意见被推翻的阶段并不需要具有特殊特征的主体(固执、极端分子等)的存在;它是由在一种极端意见上达成一致的主体与持有相反意见的其余群体之间的相互作用导致的。在前者中,一些主体可能倾向于与多数群体之外的其他主体妥协,这些主体根据其在网络中的位置,可能会像两组之间的桥梁一样,慢慢地将整个社会吸引到另一个极端。