Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan 2;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03277-2.
There is no evidence supporting the feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
The clinical data of consecutive patients with borderline resectable PDAC who received NACT and underwent either LPD or OPD between January 2020 and December 2022 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.
The analysis included 57 patients in the OPD group and 20 in the LPD group. Following NACT, the LPD group exhibited a higher median CA19-9 decrease rate compared to the OPD group (85.3% vs. 66.9%, P = 0.042). Furthermore, 3 anatomically borderline PDACs in the LPD group and 5 in the OPD group were downstaged into resectable status (30.0% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.069). According to RECIST criteria, 51 (66.2%) patients in the entire cohort were evaluated as having stable disease. The median operation time for the LPD group was longer than the OPD group (419 vs. 325 min, P < 0.001), while the venous resection rate was 35.0% vs. 43.9%, respectively (P = 0.489). There was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, with a median number of 18.5 in the LPD group and 22 in the OPD group, and the R1 margin rate (15.0% vs. 12.3%) was also comparable. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo complications (35.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.018) was lower in the LPD group compared to the OPD group. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that a tumor diameter > 3 cm before NACT (HR 2.185) and poor tumor differentiation (HR 1.805) were independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival, and a decrease rate of CA19-9 > 70% (OR 0.309) was a protective factor for early tumor recurrence and overall survival.
LPD for PDAC following NACT is feasible and oncologically equivalent to OPD. Effective control of CA19-9 levels is beneficial in reducing early tumor recurrence and improving overall survival.
尚无证据支持新辅助化疗(NACT)后行腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)相较于开腹胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)的可行性。
前瞻性收集 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间复旦大学附属肿瘤医院连续接受 NACT 并接受 LPD 或 OPD 的交界可切除胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的临床资料,并进行回顾性分析。
分析纳入 OPD 组 57 例,LPD 组 20 例。NACT 后,LPD 组 CA19-9 下降率较 OPD 组高(85.3% vs. 66.9%,P=0.042)。此外,LPD 组 3 例解剖学交界性 PDAC 降期为可切除(30.0% vs. 12.3%,P=0.069),OPD 组 5 例降期为可切除。根据 RECIST 标准,全队列 51 例(66.2%)患者病情稳定。LPD 组手术时间长于 OPD 组(419 分钟 vs. 325 分钟,P<0.001),静脉切除率分别为 35.0%和 43.9%(P=0.489)。LPD 组和 OPD 组的淋巴结检出数无差异,中位数分别为 18.5 个和 22 个,R1 切缘率(15.0% vs. 12.3%)也相似。LPD 组并发症发生率(35.0% vs. 66.7%,P=0.018)低于 OPD 组。多变量回归分析显示,NACT 前肿瘤直径>3cm(HR 2.185)和肿瘤分化差(HR 1.805)是无复发生存的独立危险因素,CA19-9 下降率>70%(OR 0.309)是早期肿瘤复发和总生存的保护因素。
NACT 后行 LPD 治疗 PDAC 是可行的,其肿瘤学疗效与 OPD 相当。有效控制 CA19-9 水平有助于降低早期肿瘤复发率,提高总生存率。