Department of Radiology, Viet Duc Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Department of Radiology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Int J Med Sci. 2024 Jan 1;21(2):200-206. doi: 10.7150/ijms.88486. eCollection 2024.
This retrospective study assessed the value of histogram parameters of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map (HA) in differentiating between benign and malignant testicular tumors. We compared the diagnostic performance of two different volume-of-interest (VOI) placement methods: VOI 1, the entire tumor; VOI 2, the tumor excluding its cystic, calcified, hemorrhagic, and necrotic portions. We retrospectively evaluated 45 patients with testicular tumors examined with scrotal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. These patients underwent surgery with the pathological result of seven benign and 39 malignant tumors. We calculated the HA parameters, including mean, median, maximum, minimum, kurtosis, skewness, entropy, standard deviation (SD), mean of positive pixels, and uniformity of positive pixels by the two different VOI segmentation methods. We compared these parameters using the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to determine their optimal cut-off, sensitivity (Se), and specificity (Sp). This study included 45 patients with 46 testicular lesions (seven benign and 39 malignant tumors), one of which had bilateral testicular seminoma. With the VOI 1 method, benign lesions had significantly lower maximum ADC ( = 0.002), ADC skewness ( = 0.017), and ADC variance ( = 0.000) than malignant lesions. In contrast, their minimum ADC was significantly higher ADC ( = 0.000). With the VOI 2 method, the benign lesions had significantly higher ADC SD ( = 0.048) and maximum ADC ( = 0.015) than malignant lesions. In contrast, their minimum ADC was significantly lower ( = 0.000). With the VOI 1 method, maximum ADC, ADC variance, and ADC skewness performed well in differentiating benign and malignant testicular lesions with cut-offs (Se, Sp, AUC) of 1846.000 (74.4%, 100%, 0.883), 39198.387 (79.5%, 85.7%, 0.868), and 0.893 (48.7%, 100%, 0.758). The HA parameters showed value in differentiating benign and malignant testicular neoplasms. The entire tumor VOI placement method was preferable to the VOI placement method excluding cystic, calcified, hemorrhagic, and necrotic portions in measuring HA parameters. Using this VOI segmentation, maximum ADC performed best in discriminating benign and malignant testicular lesions, followed by ADC variance and skewness.
本回顾性研究评估了表观扩散系数(ADC)图(HA)直方图参数在鉴别良恶性睾丸肿瘤中的价值。我们比较了两种不同的感兴趣区(VOI)放置方法的诊断性能:VOI1,整个肿瘤;VOI2,肿瘤不包括其囊性、钙化、出血和坏死部分。我们回顾性评估了 45 例经阴囊对比增强磁共振成像检查的睾丸肿瘤患者。这些患者均接受了手术治疗,病理结果为 7 例良性和 39 例恶性肿瘤。我们通过两种不同的 VOI 分割方法计算了 HA 参数,包括平均值、中位数、最大值、最小值、峰度、偏度、熵、标准差(SD)、阳性像素平均值和阳性像素均匀性。我们使用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较了这些参数,以确定其最佳截断值、敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)。本研究纳入了 45 例 46 个睾丸病变(7 个良性和 39 个恶性肿瘤),其中 1 例为双侧睾丸精原细胞瘤。采用 VOI1 方法,良性病变的最大 ADC(=0.002)、ADC 偏度(=0.017)和 ADC 方差(=0.000)明显低于恶性病变。相反,其最小 ADC 明显较高 ADC(=0.000)。采用 VOI2 方法,良性病变的 ADC SD(=0.048)和最大 ADC(=0.015)明显高于恶性病变。相反,其最小 ADC 明显较低(=0.000)。采用 VOI1 方法,最大 ADC、ADC 方差和 ADC 偏度在鉴别良恶性睾丸病变方面表现良好,截断值(Se、Sp、AUC)为 1846.000(74.4%、100%、0.883)、39198.387(79.5%、85.7%、0.868)和 0.893(48.7%、100%、0.758)。HA 参数在鉴别良恶性睾丸肿瘤方面具有价值。在测量 HA 参数时,整个肿瘤 VOI 放置方法优于不包括囊性、钙化、出血和坏死部分的 VOI 放置方法。使用这种 VOI 分割,最大 ADC 在鉴别良恶性睾丸病变方面表现最佳,其次是 ADC 方差和偏度。