Sadrabadi Haghighi Soheil, Goshayeshi Hamid Reza, Zahmatkesh Iman
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 6;10(1):e23373. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23373. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
Cooling of electronic components is one of the most important concerns of manufacturers. Using heatsinks with different models is one of the recommended methods for cooling. To compare 12 types of heatsinks, including 3 types of fin-pin heatsinks with rectangular pins, 3 types of fin-pin heatsinks with circular pins, 3 types of fin-pin heatsinks with conical pins, and 3 types of simple fin heatsinks in 5, 7, and 9 fin types regarding forced displacement heat transfer, an experiment was conducted. A special setup designed and built for these types of heatsinks was used to conduct the test. The setup had dimensions of 100 cm × 12 cm x 3 cm with an opening of 120 cm × 120 cm for placing a fan to create airflow with variable speeds and a place for placing the heatsink at the end of the wind tunnel under variable temperatures. The test results showed that the maximum error in the two experimental tests was 6 %. Also, the results showed that in all 4 types of heatsinks, 7-fin pin types had 4 to 20% lower thermal resistance and 20 to 100% higher convection heat transfer coefficient compared to the 5- and 9-fin pin types respectively. When comparing the heatsinks with the same number of fins, it was observed that the 7 and 9-fin types of heatsinks with conical fins have lower thermal resistance and higher convection heat transfer coefficient than other types of heatsinks with the same number of fins, The conical fins having more than 81 % convection heat transfer coefficient compared to the plate fin heatsink. It was also observed that in the 5-pin fin heatsink design, the plate-fin heat sink had the lowest amount of heat resistance due to its higher surface area with the flowing air current.
电子元件的散热是制造商最为关注的问题之一。使用不同型号的散热器是推荐的散热方法之一。为了比较12种散热器,包括3种带矩形引脚的鳍片针式散热器、3种带圆形引脚的鳍片针式散热器、3种带锥形引脚的鳍片针式散热器以及3种5鳍、7鳍和9鳍类型的简单鳍片散热器在强制位移传热方面的性能,进行了一项实验。使用为这些类型的散热器专门设计和制造的装置进行测试。该装置的尺寸为100厘米×12厘米×3厘米,有一个120厘米×120厘米的开口用于放置风扇以产生可变速度的气流,并且在风洞末端有一个用于在可变温度下放置散热器的位置。测试结果表明,两次实验测试中的最大误差为6%。此外,结果表明,在所有4种类型的散热器中,与5鳍和9鳍针式散热器相比,7鳍针式散热器的热阻分别低4%至20%,对流换热系数高20%至100%。当比较鳍片数量相同的散热器时,观察到带锥形鳍片的7鳍和9鳍类型的散热器比其他鳍片数量相同的散热器具有更低的热阻和更高的对流换热系数,与平板鳍片散热器相比,锥形鳍片的对流换热系数超过81%。还观察到,在5针鳍片散热器设计中,平板鳍片散热器由于其与流动气流的较高表面积而具有最低的热阻。