Suppr超能文献

论记忆在错误信息纠正中的作用:重复曝光、纠正的持久性和来源可信度。

On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility.

作者信息

Kemp Paige L, Goldman Aaron C, Wahlheim Christopher N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101783. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101783. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

Abstract

Misinformation can negatively affect cognition, beliefs, and behavior, and thus contribute to societal disruption. Correcting misinformation can counteract these effects by updating memory and beliefs. In this selective review, we highlight recent perspectives on and evidence for the role of memory in the efficacy of correction methods. Two theoretical accounts propose that repeating misinformation can impair or improve correction efficacy to the extent that familiarity or integrative encoding prevails. We summarize evidence that recollection of corrections can counteract potential interference from misinformation repetitions on memory and belief updating. The efficacy of such updating also declines over time, especially when misinformation sources are not remembered. We call for more research on the role of memory in everyday misinformation corrections to better understand interactions among these processes.

摘要

错误信息会对认知、信念和行为产生负面影响,从而导致社会混乱。纠正错误信息可以通过更新记忆和信念来抵消这些影响。在这篇选择性综述中,我们强调了关于记忆在纠正方法有效性中所起作用的最新观点和证据。两种理论观点认为,重复错误信息在一定程度上会损害或提高纠正效果,具体取决于熟悉度或整合编码占主导地位的情况。我们总结了证据,即对纠正内容的回忆可以抵消错误信息重复对记忆和信念更新可能产生的干扰。这种更新的效果也会随着时间的推移而下降,尤其是当错误信息来源被遗忘时。我们呼吁对记忆在日常错误信息纠正中的作用进行更多研究,以便更好地理解这些过程之间的相互作用。

相似文献

1
On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101783. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101783. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
2
Correcting fake news headlines after repeated exposure: memory and belief accuracy in younger and older adults.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Aug 26;9(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00585-3.
5
Memory failure predicts belief regression after the correction of misinformation.
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105276. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105276. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
6
Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 7;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00546-w.
7
Correcting eyewitness suggestibility: does explanatory role predict resistance to correction?
Memory. 2021 Jan;29(1):59-77. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1854788. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
8
Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 3;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00492-z.
9
Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Aug 26;5(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00241-6.
10
The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation.
Cogn Process. 2020 Aug;21(3):321-330. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00974-8. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验