Wang Peng, Zhang Yu, Xu Wenhao, He Jialing, Peng Liyuan, Feng Yuning, Xu Ping, Chong Weelic, Hai Yang, Jia Lu, Fang Fang
West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Jan 3;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01240-5.
Randomized controlled trials have found that once-weekly insulin resulted in greater glycemic control compared to once-daily insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, no direct comparisons have been made between different types of once-weekly insulin thus far. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the two most advanced once-weekly insulin analogues, namely insulin icodec and insulin Fc, in patients with type 2 diabetes.
We conducted a thorough search in the databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search included articles published from the beginning to October 10, 2023, with no language limitations. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness and safety of once-weekly insulin in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Our primary outcome was to evaluate excellent glycemic control, defined as patients achieving glycated hemoglobin levels below 7%.
We identified a total of 7 trials involving 2829 patients. The results showed that once-weekly insulin icodec is more effective than once-weekly insulin Fc (RR 1.59 [95% CI 1.08-2.38]), once-daily degludec (RR 1.43 [95% CI 1.14-1.83]), and once-daily glargine (RR 1.15 [95% CI 1.00-1.41]). Moreover, the incidence of severe hypoglycemia was lower with once-weekly insulin icodec compared to once-daily degludec (RR 0.00016 [95% CI 0 to 0.41]). However, no significant difference in the incidence of severe hypoglycemia was observed between once-weekly insulin icodec and once-daily glargine (RR 0.39 [95% CI 0.03 to 4.83]).
In patients with type 2 diabetes, once-weekly insulin icodec achieved superior glycemic control compared to once-weekly insulin Fc, with no significant difference in the occurrence of hypoglycemia. The ranking probability results have shown that one weekly icodec seems to be the preferred option in patients with type 2 diabetes.
PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023470894.
随机对照试验发现,对于2型糖尿病患者,与每日一次胰岛素相比,每周一次胰岛素能实现更好的血糖控制。然而,迄今为止,尚未对不同类型的每周一次胰岛素进行直接比较。本系统评价和网状Meta分析旨在评估两种最先进的每周一次胰岛素类似物,即icodec胰岛素和Fc胰岛素,对2型糖尿病患者的疗效。
我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库中进行了全面检索。检索范围包括从开始到2023年10月10日发表的文章,无语言限制。我们的目的是对调查每周一次胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者有效性和安全性的随机对照试验进行系统评价。我们的主要结局是评估血糖控制良好,定义为糖化血红蛋白水平低于7%的患者。
我们共纳入了7项试验,涉及2829例患者。结果显示,每周一次的icodec胰岛素比每周一次的Fc胰岛素(风险比1.59 [95%置信区间1.08 - 2.38])、每日一次的德谷胰岛素(风险比1.43 [95%置信区间1.14 - 1.83])和每日一次的甘精胰岛素(风险比1.15 [95%置信区间1.00 - 1.41])更有效。此外,与每日一次的德谷胰岛素相比,每周一次的icodec胰岛素严重低血糖发生率更低(风险比0.00016 [95%置信区间0至0.41])。然而,每周一次的icodec胰岛素和每日一次的甘精胰岛素之间在严重低血糖发生率上未观察到显著差异(风险比0.39 [95%置信区间0.03至4.83])。
对于2型糖尿病患者,每周一次的icodec胰岛素比每周一次的Fc胰岛素实现了更好的血糖控制,低血糖发生率无显著差异。排序概率结果表明,每周一次的icodec胰岛素似乎是2型糖尿病患者的首选方案。
PROSPERO标识符:CRD42023470894。