Biswas Indranil, Giri Hemant, Panicker Sumith R, Rezaie Alireza R
Cardiovascular Biology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (I.B., H.G., S.R.P., A.R.R.).
Now with Excitant Therapeutics, Edmond, OK (H.G.).
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024 Mar;44(3):603-616. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.123.320185. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
Cleavage of the extracellular domain of PAR1 (protease-activated receptor 1) by thrombin at Arg41 and by APC (activated protein C) at Arg46 initiates paradoxical cytopathic and cytoprotective signaling in endothelial cells. In the latter case, the ligand-dependent coreceptor signaling by EPCR (endothelial protein C receptor) is required for the protective PAR1 signaling by APC. Here, we investigated the role of thrombomodulin in determining the specificity of PAR1 signaling by thrombin.
We prepared a PAR1 knockout (PAR1) EA.hy926 endothelial cell line by CRISPR/Cas9 and transduced PAR1 cells with lentivirus vectors expressing PAR1 mutants in which either Arg41 or Arg46 was replaced with an Ala. Furthermore, human embryonic kidney 293 cells were transfected with wild-type or mutant PAR1 cleavage reporter constructs carrying N-terminal Nluc (NanoLuc luciferase) and C-terminal enhanced yellow fluorescent protein tags.
Characterization of transfected cells in signaling and receptor cleavage assays revealed that, upon interaction with thrombomodulin, thrombin cleaves Arg46 to elicit cytoprotective effects by a β-arrestin-2 biased signaling mechanism. Analysis of functional data and cleavage rates indicated that thrombin-thrombomodulin cleaves Arg46>10-fold faster than APC. Upon interaction with thrombin, the cytoplasmic domain of thrombomodulin recruited both β-arrestin-1 and -2 to the plasma membrane. Thus, the thrombin cleavage of Arg41 was also cytoprotective in thrombomodulin-expressing cells by β-arrestin-1-biased signaling. APC in the absence of EPCR cleaved Arg41 to initiate disruptive signaling responses like thrombin.
These results suggest that coreceptor signaling by thrombomodulin and EPCR determines the PAR1 cleavage and signaling specificity of thrombin and APC, respectively.
凝血酶在精氨酸41位点切割PAR1(蛋白酶激活受体1)的细胞外结构域,活化蛋白C(APC)在精氨酸46位点切割PAR1,在内皮细胞中引发矛盾的细胞病变和细胞保护信号。在后一种情况下,APC的保护性PAR1信号传导需要内皮蛋白C受体(EPCR)依赖配体的共受体信号传导。在此,我们研究了血栓调节蛋白在确定凝血酶PAR1信号传导特异性中的作用。
我们通过CRISPR/Cas9制备了PAR1基因敲除(PAR1-/-)EA.hy926内皮细胞系,并用表达精氨酸41或精氨酸46被丙氨酸取代的PAR1突变体的慢病毒载体转导PAR1-/-细胞。此外,用携带N端纳米荧光素酶(Nluc)和C端增强型黄色荧光蛋白标签的野生型或突变型PAR1切割报告构建体转染人胚肾293细胞。
在信号传导和受体切割试验中对转染细胞的表征显示,与血栓调节蛋白相互作用时,凝血酶切割精氨酸46,通过β-抑制蛋白2偏向的信号传导机制引发细胞保护作用。功能数据和切割速率分析表明,凝血酶-血栓调节蛋白切割精氨酸46的速度比APC快10倍以上。与凝血酶相互作用时,血栓调节蛋白的胞质结构域将β-抑制蛋白1和β-抑制蛋白2募集到质膜。因此,在表达血栓调节蛋白的细胞中,精氨酸41的凝血酶切割通过β-抑制蛋白1偏向的信号传导也具有细胞保护作用。在没有EPCR的情况下,APC切割精氨酸41以启动类似凝血酶的破坏性信号反应。
这些结果表明,血栓调节蛋白和EPCR的共受体信号传导分别决定了凝血酶和APC的PAR1切割和信号传导特异性。