• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院和日间诊所环境中,图式治疗对比认知行为治疗对比支持性心理治疗对抑郁症的疗效:一项随机临床试验。

Effectiveness of Schema Therapy versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Supportive Therapy for Depression in Inpatient and Day Clinic Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.

Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom. 2024;93(1):24-35. doi: 10.1159/000535492. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1159/000535492
PMID:38176391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10880804/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Schema therapy (ST) reduces depressive symptoms, but clinical trials have not investigated its effectiveness for patients suffering from severe forms of depression and high rates of comorbidities. There is high demand for exploring and improving treatments for this patient group. The objective of the current study was to evaluate whether ST is more effective than individual supportive therapy (IST) and noninferior compared with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating depression.

METHODS

For this clinical trial, medicated patients were recruited in inpatient and day clinic settings. The major inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 75 years and primary diagnosis of depression without psychotic symptoms. A total of 292 participants were randomized to ST, CBT, or IST and received 7 weeks of psychotherapy (up to 14 individual and 14 group sessions). The primary outcome was change in depression severity after treatment measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II. Primary test for efficacy was superiority of ST over IST. Secondary test was noninferiority of ST compared with CBT. Multilevel modeling was conducted. The results at 6-month follow-up were explored.

RESULTS

Across treatment, ST was not superior to IST. Secondary outcome analyses and completer analyses showed similar results. However, ST showed clinically relevant noninferiority compared with CBT.

CONCLUSION

ST for depression as part of a psychiatric care program showed clinical noninferiority compared to CBT, without being superior to IST. ST represents a potentially useful addition to the therapeutic repertoire for the treatment of depression but its efficacy, including long-term efficacy, should be evaluated further.

摘要

简介

图式治疗(ST)可减轻抑郁症状,但临床试验尚未研究其对患有严重形式的抑郁症和高共病率的患者的有效性。对于探索和改善这类患者群体的治疗方法存在巨大的需求。本研究的目的是评估 ST 是否比个体支持性治疗(IST)更有效,以及与认知行为治疗(CBT)相比是否不劣效,用于治疗抑郁症。

方法

在这项临床试验中,我们在住院和日间诊所环境中招募了服用药物的患者。主要纳入标准为年龄在 18 至 75 岁之间,以及原发性无精神病症状的抑郁症诊断。共有 292 名参与者被随机分配到 ST、CBT 或 IST 组,并接受了 7 周的心理治疗(最多 14 次个体和 14 次团体治疗)。主要结局是治疗后抑郁严重程度的变化,通过贝克抑郁量表-II 进行评估。疗效的主要检验是 ST 优于 IST。次要检验是 ST 与 CBT 相比非劣效。采用多级模型进行分析。还探讨了 6 个月随访时的结果。

结果

在所有治疗中,ST 均不优于 IST。二次结局分析和完成者分析显示出相似的结果。然而,ST 与 CBT 相比显示出具有临床意义的非劣效性。

结论

作为精神科护理计划的一部分的 ST 治疗抑郁症显示出与 CBT 相比的临床非劣效性,而不优于 IST。ST 代表了一种对抑郁症治疗具有潜在有用的补充治疗方法,但应进一步评估其疗效,包括长期疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/10880804/0eea10d86926/pps-2024-0093-0001-535492_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/10880804/4ac5cc8e8db0/pps-2024-0093-0001-535492_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/10880804/dfd9270ac549/pps-2024-0093-0001-535492_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/10880804/0eea10d86926/pps-2024-0093-0001-535492_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/10880804/4ac5cc8e8db0/pps-2024-0093-0001-535492_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/10880804/dfd9270ac549/pps-2024-0093-0001-535492_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/10880804/0eea10d86926/pps-2024-0093-0001-535492_F03.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Schema Therapy versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Supportive Therapy for Depression in Inpatient and Day Clinic Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.住院和日间诊所环境中,图式治疗对比认知行为治疗对比支持性心理治疗对抑郁症的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2024;93(1):24-35. doi: 10.1159/000535492. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
Schema therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy versus individual supportive therapy for depression in an inpatient and day clinic setting: study protocol of the OPTIMA-RCT.在住院和日间诊所环境中,针对抑郁症的图式治疗与认知行为治疗和个体支持性治疗的比较:OPTIMA-RCT 的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02880-x.
3
Manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy in treating depression in advanced cancer: the CanTalk RCT.在晚期癌症中治疗抑郁的手册化认知行为疗法:CanTalk RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(19):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta23190.
4
Internet-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy versus internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with depressive symptoms: randomized controlled noninferiority trial.针对有抑郁症状的成年人,网络人际心理治疗与网络认知行为治疗的比较:随机对照非劣效性试验
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 13;15(5):e82. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2307.
5
The Clinical Effectiveness of Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Compared With Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adult Depression: Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.混合认知行为疗法与面对面认知行为疗法治疗成人抑郁症的临床效果比较:随机对照非劣效性试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 7;24(9):e36577. doi: 10.2196/36577.
6
Efficacy and Posttreatment Effects of Therapist-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Supportive Psychotherapy for Adults With Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.治疗师提供的认知行为疗法与支持性心理治疗对躯体变形障碍成人的疗效和治疗后影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;76(4):363-373. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4156.
7
Metacognitive Therapy versus Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Adults with Major Depression: A Parallel Single-Blind Randomised Trial.认知行为疗法与元认知疗法治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的随机单盲平行对照试验
Sci Rep. 2020 May 12;10(1):7878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64577-1.
8
Cognitive-behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy versus brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depression (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled trial.认知行为疗法与短期精神分析心理治疗对比针对单相重度抑郁症青少年的简短社会心理干预(IMPACT):一项多中心、实用、观察者盲法、随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(12):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta21120.
9
Testing Mechanisms of Change for Text Message-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Randomized Clinical Trial for Young Adult Depression.短信传递认知行为疗法的改变机制测试:针对青年抑郁症的随机临床试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jul 11;11:e45186. doi: 10.2196/45186.
10
Schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression: study protocol for a parallel group randomized clinical trial (DEPRE-ST).方案治疗与常规治疗对治疗困难的门诊抑郁症患者的比较:一项平行组随机临床试验(DEPRE-ST)的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Apr 16;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08079-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrative gene and isoform co-expression networks reveal regulatory rewiring in stress-related psychiatric disorders.整合基因和异构体共表达网络揭示应激相关精神疾病中的调控重连。
iScience. 2025 Aug 13;28(9):113342. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113342. eCollection 2025 Sep 19.
2
Statistical analysis plan for a parallel group randomized clinical trial comparing schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression (DEPRE-ST).一项平行组随机临床试验的统计分析计划,该试验比较了图式疗法与常规治疗对难治性抑郁症门诊患者的疗效(DEPRE-ST)。
Trials. 2025 Sep 1;26(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09012-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Adjustment for Baseline Characteristics in Randomized Clinical Trials.随机临床试验中基线特征的调整
JAMA. 2022 Dec 6;328(21):2155-2156. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21506.
2
Prevalence and prediction of dropout during depression treatment in routine outpatient care: an observational study.在常规门诊治疗中抑郁症治疗期间辍学的发生率和预测:一项观察性研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Aug;273(5):1151-1161. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01499-1. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Treatment efficacy and effectiveness in adults with major depressive disorder and childhood trauma history: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ecological Momentary Assessment versus Weekly Questionnaire Assessment of Change in Depression.
抑郁症变化的生态瞬时评估与每周问卷调查评估
Depress Anxiety. 2024 Jul 11;2024:9191823. doi: 10.1155/2024/9191823. eCollection 2024.
4
Schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression: study protocol for a parallel group randomized clinical trial (DEPRE-ST).方案治疗与常规治疗对治疗困难的门诊抑郁症患者的比较:一项平行组随机临床试验(DEPRE-ST)的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Apr 16;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08079-9.
成年重度抑郁症患者伴童年创伤史的治疗疗效与效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;9(11):860-873. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00227-9. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Staging of unipolar depression: systematic review and discussion of clinical implications.单相抑郁症的分期:系统评价及临床意义探讨。
Psychol Med. 2022 Jul;52(9):1621-1628. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722001507. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
Evaluating the role of maladaptive personality traits in schema therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy for depression.评估适应不良人格特质在抑郁症的图式治疗和认知行为治疗中的作用。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(10):4405-4414. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722001209. Epub 2022 May 10.
6
Effectiveness of Predominantly Group Schema Therapy and Combined Individual and Group Schema Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.主要团体图式治疗和个体与团体图式治疗相结合治疗边缘型人格障碍的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):287-299. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0010.
7
Supportive Evidence: Brief Supportive Psychotherapy as Active Control and Clinical Intervention.支持证据:简短支持性心理治疗作为积极对照和临床干预。
Am J Psychother. 2022 Sep 1;75(3):122-128. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2021.20210041. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
In support of supportive psychotherapy.支持性心理治疗的支持依据。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):59-60. doi: 10.1002/wps.20949.
9
Early maladaptive schemas and depression in adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期适应不良模式与成年人抑郁症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Jan;29(1):111-130. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2630. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types.抑郁症的心理治疗:一项网络荟萃分析,涵盖所有主要治疗类型的疗效、可接受性和长期结果。
World Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;20(2):283-293. doi: 10.1002/wps.20860.