Suppr超能文献

以患者为中心的质量指标与出院后非计划性医疗护理的使用相关。

Person-centred quality indicators are associated with unplanned care use following hospital discharge.

机构信息

Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Department of Paediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 3;13(1):e002501. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002501.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Performance indicators are used to evaluate the quality of healthcare services. The majority of these, however, are derived solely from administrative data and rarely incorporate feedback from patients who receive services. Recently, our research team developed person-centred quality indicators (PC-QIs), which were co-created with patients. It is unknown whether these PC-QIs are associated with unplanned healthcare use following discharge from hospital.

DESIGN

A retrospective, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Survey responses were obtained from April 2014 to September 2020 using the Canadian Patient Experiences Survey - Inpatient Care instrument. Logistic regression models were used to predict the link between eight PC-QIs and two outcomes; unplanned readmissions within 30 days and emergency department visits within 7 days.

RESULTS

A total of 114 129 surveys were included for analysis. 6.0% of respondents (n=6854) were readmitted within 30 days, and 9.9% (n=11 287) visited an emergency department within 7 days of their index discharge. In adjusted models, 'top box' responses for communication between patients and physicians (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.82, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.88), receiving information about taking medication (aOR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.92) and transition planning at hospital discharge (aOR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.85) were associated with lower odds of emergency department visit.Likewise, 'top box' responses for overall experience (aOR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.93), communication between patients and physicians (aOR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.80) and receiving information about taking medication (aOR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.98), were associated with lower odds of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that patient reports of their in-hospital experiences may have value in predicting future healthcare use. In developing the PC-QIs, patients indicated which elements of their hospital care matter most to them, and our results show agreement between subjective and objective measures of care quality. Future research may explore how current readmission prediction models may be augmented by person-reported experiences.

摘要

目的

绩效指标用于评估医疗服务质量。然而,其中大多数指标仅源自行政数据,很少纳入接受服务的患者的反馈。最近,我们的研究团队开发了以患者为中心的质量指标(PC-QIs),这些指标是与患者共同创建的。目前尚不清楚这些 PC-QIs 是否与出院后计划外的医疗使用有关。

设计

回顾性、横断面研究。

方法

使用加拿大患者体验调查-住院护理工具,于 2014 年 4 月至 2020 年 9 月期间获得调查回复。使用逻辑回归模型预测 8 个 PC-QIs 与两个结果之间的联系:30 天内计划内再入院和 7 天内急诊就诊。

结果

共纳入 114129 份调查进行分析。6.0%的受访者(n=6854)在 30 天内再次入院,9.9%(n=11287)在出院后 7 天内到急诊就诊。在调整后的模型中,患者与医生之间的沟通(调整后的 OR(aOR)=0.82,95%CI:0.77 至 0.88)、接受关于服药信息(aOR=0.86,95%CI:0.80 至 0.92)和出院时的过渡计划(aOR=0.79,95%CI:0.73 至 0.85)的“最佳答案”回复与急诊就诊的可能性较低相关。同样,整体体验的“最佳答案”回复(aOR=0.87,95%CI:0.82 至 0.93)、患者与医生之间的沟通(aOR=0.73,95%CI:0.67 至 0.80)和接受关于服药信息(aOR=0.90,95%CI:0.83 至 0.98)的回复与再入院的可能性较低相关。

结论

本研究表明,患者对住院期间体验的报告可能对预测未来的医疗使用具有价值。在开发 PC-QIs 时,患者指出了他们的住院护理中最重要的要素,我们的结果表明,主观和客观护理质量测量之间存在一致性。未来的研究可能会探讨如何通过患者报告的体验来增强当前的再入院预测模型。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
10
Are all readmissions bad readmissions?所有再入院都是不良再入院吗?
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 15;363(3):297-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1001882.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验