Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Auton Neurosci. 2024 Feb;251:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2023.103144. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a prevalent condition characterized by a sudden drop in blood pressure and heart rate, leading to a brief loss of consciousness and postural control. Recurrent episodes of VVS significantly impact the quality of life and are a common reason for emergency department visits. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga, have been proposed as potential treatments for VVS. However, their efficacy in preventing VVS remains uncertain.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing non-pharmacological interventions with control in preventing VVS recurrence. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate of VVS episodes.
A total of 1130 participants from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mean effect size for non-pharmacological interventions versus control was 0.245 (95 % CI: 0.128-0.471, p-value <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that yoga had the largest effect size (odds ratio 0.068, 95 % CI: 0.018-0.250), while tilt training had the lowest effect size (odds ratio 0.402, 95 % CI: 0.171-0.946) compared to control. Physical counter pressure maneuvers demonstrated an odds ratio of 0.294 (95 % CI: 0.165-0.524) compared to control.
Non-pharmacological interventions show promise in preventing recurrent VVS episodes. Yoga, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and tilt training can be considered as viable treatment options. Further research, including randomized studies comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these interventions for VVS treatment.
血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)是一种常见病症,其特征是血压和心率突然下降,导致短暂失去意识和姿势控制。反复发作的 VVS 会显著影响生活质量,是急诊科就诊的常见原因。倾斜训练、身体对抗压力动作和瑜伽等非药物干预措施已被提议作为 VVS 的潜在治疗方法。然而,它们预防 VVS 复发的疗效仍不确定。
按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase,截至 2023 年 3 月,以比较非药物干预与对照预防 VVS 复发的随机对照试验。主要结局是 VVS 发作的复发率。
共有来自 18 项研究的 1130 名参与者纳入荟萃分析。非药物干预与对照组相比,总体平均效应大小为 0.245(95%CI:0.128-0.471,p 值<0.001)。亚组分析显示,瑜伽的效应量最大(比值比 0.068,95%CI:0.018-0.250),而倾斜训练的效应量最小(比值比 0.402,95%CI:0.171-0.946)与对照组相比。与对照组相比,身体对抗压力动作的比值比为 0.294(95%CI:0.165-0.524)。
非药物干预措施在预防反复发作的 VVS 方面显示出前景。瑜伽、身体对抗压力动作和倾斜训练可被视为可行的治疗选择。需要进一步的研究,包括比较药物和非药物方法的随机研究,以评估这些干预措施治疗 VVS 的安全性和疗效。