Dougherty Russell, Thrailkill Eric A, Mohammed Zaidan, VonDoepp Sarah, Hilton-Vanosdall Ella, Charette Sam, Van Horn Sarah, Quirk Adrianna, Kraus Adina, Toufexis Donna J
Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, 2 Colchester Ave, Burlington VT 05405, United States.
Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, 2 Colchester Ave, Burlington VT 05405, United States; Department of Psychiatry, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, University of Vermont 1 South Prospect Street, MS 446AR6, Burlington, VT 05401, United States; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, MS 482, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Physiol Behav. 2024 Mar 1;275:114456. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114456. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
Instrumental behavior can reflect the influence of goal-directed and habitual systems. Contemporary research suggests that stress may facilitate control by the habitual system under conditions where the behavior would otherwise reflect control by the goal-directed system. However, it is unclear how stress modulates the influence of these systems on instrumental responding to achieve this effect, particularly in females. Here, we examine whether a mild psychogenic stressor experienced before acquisition training (Experiment 1), or prior to the test of expression (Experiment 2) would influence goal-directed and habitual control of instrumental responding in female rats. In both experiments, rats acquired an instrumental nose-poke response for a sucrose reward. This was followed by a reinforcer devaluation phase in which half the rats in Stressed and Non-Stressed conditions received pairings of the sucrose pellet with illness induced by lithium chloride until they rejected the pellet when offered. The remaining rats received a control treatment consisting of pellets and illness on separate days (Unpaired). Control by goal-directed and habitual systems was evaluated in a subsequent nonreinforced test of nose poking. The results of Experiment 1 indicated that the Non-Stressed Paired group reduced nose-poking compared to the Unpaired controls, identifying the response as goal directed, whereas the Stressed Paired and Unpaired groups made a similar number of nose pokes identifying the response as habitual despite a similar amount of training. Results from Experiment 2 indicated habitual control of nose-poke responding was present when stress was experienced just prior to the test. Collectively, these data suggest that stress may facilitate habitual control by altering the relative influence of goal-directed and habitual processes underpinning instrumental behavior. These results may be clinically relevant for understanding the contributions of stress to dysregulated instrumental behavior in compulsive pathologies.
工具性动作可以反映目标导向系统和习惯系统的影响。当代研究表明,在行为原本会反映目标导向系统控制的情况下,压力可能会促进习惯系统的控制。然而,目前尚不清楚压力如何调节这些系统对工具性反应的影响以达到这种效果,尤其是在雌性动物中。在此,我们研究在习得训练前(实验1)或表达测试前(实验2)经历的轻度心理应激源是否会影响雌性大鼠工具性反应的目标导向控制和习惯控制。在两个实验中,大鼠都学会了通过鼻触反应获取蔗糖奖励。随后是强化物贬值阶段,在这个阶段,应激组和非应激组中各有一半的大鼠接受蔗糖颗粒与氯化锂诱发疾病的配对,直到它们在提供颗粒时拒绝食用。其余大鼠接受一种对照处理,即在不同日期分别给予颗粒和疾病(非配对)。在随后的非强化鼻触测试中评估目标导向系统和习惯系统的控制情况。实验1的结果表明,与非配对对照组相比,非应激配对组减少了鼻触次数,表明该反应是目标导向的,而应激配对组和非配对组的鼻触次数相似,表明该反应是习惯性的,尽管训练量相似。实验2的结果表明,在测试前刚经历应激时,鼻触反应存在习惯控制。总体而言,这些数据表明,压力可能通过改变支撑工具性动作的目标导向过程和习惯过程的相对影响来促进习惯控制。这些结果对于理解压力在强迫性疾病中对失调的工具性动作的作用可能具有临床意义。