Suppr超能文献

硬膜外脊髓电刺激治疗痉挛:文献系统评价。

Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spasticity: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:227-238.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.158. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Spasticity is a form of muscle hypertonia secondary to various diseases, including traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. Medical treatments are available; however, these often result in insufficient clinical response. This review evaluates the role of epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of spasticity and associated functional outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Embase, CENTRAL, and MEDLINE databases. We included studies that used epidural SCS to treat spasticity. Studies investigating functional electric stimulation, transcutaneous SCS, and animal models of spasticity were excluded. We also excluded studies that used SCS to treat other symptoms such as pain.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled rate of subjective improvement in spasticity was 78% (95% confidence interval, 64%-91%; I = 77%), 40% (95% confidence interval, 7%-73%; I = 88%) for increased H-reflex threshold or decreased Hoffman reflex/muscle response wave ratio, and 73% (65%-80%; I = 50%) for improved ambulation. Patients with spinal causes had better outcomes compared with patients with cerebral causes. Up to 10% of patients experienced complications including infections and hardware malfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review of the literature suggests that SCS may be a safe and useful tool for the management of spasticity; however, there is significant heterogeneity among studies. The quality of studies is also low. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the usefulness of this technology, including various stimulation paradigms across different causes of spasticity.

摘要

目的

痉挛是一种肌肉张力亢进的形式,继发于多种疾病,包括创伤性脑损伤、脊髓损伤、脑瘫和多发性硬化症等。有多种医学治疗方法可供选择;然而,这些方法往往导致临床疗效不足。本综述评估了硬膜外脊髓刺激(SCS)在治疗痉挛和相关功能结果中的作用。

方法

使用 Embase、CENTRAL 和 MEDLINE 数据库进行文献系统综述。我们纳入了使用硬膜外 SCS 治疗痉挛的研究。排除了研究功能性电刺激、经皮 SCS 和痉挛动物模型的研究。我们还排除了使用 SCS 治疗其他症状(如疼痛)的研究。

结果

最终分析纳入了 34 项研究。痉挛主观改善的汇总率为 78%(95%置信区间,64%-91%;I²=77%),H 反射阈值升高或 Hoffman 反射/肌肉反应波比值降低的比例为 40%(95%置信区间,7%-73%;I²=88%),步行能力改善的比例为 73%(65%-80%;I²=50%)。脊髓原因引起的痉挛患者的治疗效果优于脑原因引起的痉挛患者。高达 10%的患者出现并发症,包括感染和硬件故障。

结论

我们对文献的综述表明,SCS 可能是一种安全且有用的痉挛管理工具;然而,研究之间存在显著的异质性。研究的质量也较低。需要进一步的研究来全面评估这项技术的实用性,包括不同病因的痉挛的各种刺激模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验