• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓刺激对多病因所致小纤维神经病变及相关合并症患者的影响

Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Small Fiber and Associated Comorbidities from Neuropathy After Multiple Etiologies.

作者信息

Canós-Verdecho Ángeles, Bermejo Ara, Castel Beatriz, Izquierdo Rosa, Robledo Ruth, Gallach Elisa, Sevilla Teresa, Argente Pilar, Huertas Ismael, Peraita-Costa Isabel, Morales-Suarez-Varela María

机构信息

Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain.

Anaesthesiology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Av. de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 20;14(2):652. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020652.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14020652
PMID:39860657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11766218/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on pain, neuropathic symptoms, and other health-related metrics in patients with chronic painful peripheral neuropathy (PN) from multiple etiologies. A prospective single center observational longitudinal cohort study assessed SCS efficacy from April 2023 to May 2024, with follow-ups at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months in 19 patients suffering from the painful polyneuropathy of diverse etiologies: diabetic (DPN), idiopathic (CIAP), chemotherapy-induced (CIPN), and others. Patients were implanted with a neurostimulator (WaveWriter Alpha, Boston Scientific Corporation, Valencia, CA, USA) and percutaneous leads targeting the lower limbs (T10-T11) and, if necessary, the upper limbs (C4-C7). Stimulation programming was individualized based on patient preference and best response. Assessments were performed before and after implantation and included pain intensity (VAS and DN4), neuropathic pain symptoms (NPSI and SF-MPQ-2), autonomic symptoms (SFN-SIQ and SAS), sensory and small fiber nerve injury (UENS), functionality (GAF), sleep (CPSI), global impression of change (CGI and PGI), and quality of life (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D). Intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) via skin biopsy was also performed at baseline (diagnostic) and after 12 months to assess potential small fiber re-growth. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the evolution of treatment success. To date, 19 patients have undergone implantation and completed follow-up. SCS produced a significant consistent and sustained improvement in pain intensity by 49% in DN4 and 76% in VAS, in neuropathic pain symptoms by 73%, in autonomic symptoms by 26-30%, in the sensorimotor physical exam by 8%, in functionality by 44%, in sleep by 74%, and in quality of life (69% for EQ-VAS and 134% EQ-5D). Both clinicians and patients had a meaningful global impression of change, at 1.1 and 1.3, respectively. Distal intra-epidermal nerve fiber density improved by 22% at 12 months while proximal intra-epidermal nerve fiber density decreased by 18%. SCS is an effective therapy for managing various types of PN.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估脊髓刺激(SCS)对多种病因引起的慢性疼痛性周围神经病变(PN)患者的疼痛、神经病变症状及其他健康相关指标的影响。一项前瞻性单中心观察性纵向队列研究于2023年4月至2024年5月评估了SCS的疗效,对19例患有不同病因所致疼痛性多发性神经病变的患者进行了2个月、4个月、6个月和12个月的随访,病因包括糖尿病性(DPN)、特发性(CIAP)、化疗诱导性(CIPN)等。患者植入了神经刺激器(WaveWriter Alpha,美国波士顿科学公司,加利福尼亚州瓦伦西亚),经皮导线靶向下肢(T10 - T11),必要时靶向上肢(C4 - C7)。刺激程序根据患者偏好和最佳反应进行个体化设置。在植入前后进行评估,包括疼痛强度(VAS和DN4)、神经性疼痛症状(NPSI和SF - MPQ - 2)、自主神经症状(SFN - SIQ和SAS)、感觉和小纤维神经损伤(UENS)、功能(GAF)、睡眠(CPSI)、总体变化印象(CGI和PGI)以及生活质量(EQ - VAS和EQ - 5D)。在基线(诊断时)和12个月后还通过皮肤活检进行了表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFD)检测,以评估潜在的小纤维再生情况。进行统计分析以确定治疗成功的进展情况。迄今为止,19例患者已接受植入并完成随访。SCS使疼痛强度显著、持续改善,DN4改善49%,VAS改善76%;神经性疼痛症状改善73%;自主神经症状改善26% - 30%;感觉运动体格检查改善8%;功能改善44%;睡眠改善74%;生活质量改善(EQ - VAS改善69%,EQ - 5D改善134%)。临床医生和患者对总体变化的印象分别为1.1和1.3,均具有意义。12个月时,远端表皮内神经纤维密度提高了22%,而近端表皮内神经纤维密度下降了18%。SCS是治疗各种类型PN的有效疗法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/11766218/7817c63f2080/jcm-14-00652-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/11766218/695799d9dfd3/jcm-14-00652-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/11766218/2784e4329eaf/jcm-14-00652-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/11766218/7817c63f2080/jcm-14-00652-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/11766218/695799d9dfd3/jcm-14-00652-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/11766218/2784e4329eaf/jcm-14-00652-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7867/11766218/7817c63f2080/jcm-14-00652-g003a.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Small Fiber and Associated Comorbidities from Neuropathy After Multiple Etiologies.脊髓刺激对多病因所致小纤维神经病变及相关合并症患者的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 20;14(2):652. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020652.
2
High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz) alters sensory function and nerve fiber density in painful diabetic neuropathy: a pilot prospective open-label study.高频脊髓刺激(10 kHz)改变痛性糖尿病周围神经病的感觉功能和神经纤维密度:一项前瞻性开放标记研究的初步结果。
Pain Med. 2023 Oct 13;24(Supplement_2):S33-S40. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad096.
3
A Novel, Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveform for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain: Six-Month Results of a Prospective, Single-Arm, Dose-Response Study.一种新型、无感觉异常的脊髓刺激波形治疗慢性神经性腰痛:前瞻性、单臂、剂量反应研究的 6 个月结果。
Neuromodulation. 2023 Oct;26(7):1412-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
4
Spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a multicentre randomized clinical trial.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Pain. 2014 Nov;155(11):2426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
5
Quality of life increases in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy following treatment with spinal cord stimulation.脊髓刺激治疗后,疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者的生活质量有所提高。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1771-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1211-4. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
6
Quantitative assessment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy after high-frequency spinal cord stimulation: a pilot study.高频脊髓刺激治疗后痛性糖尿病周围神经病的定量评估:一项初步研究。
Pain Med. 2023 Oct 13;24(Supplement_2):S41-S47. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad087.
7
High-Frequency 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Refractory Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: 12-Month Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.高频10千赫脊髓刺激改善难治性疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者的健康相关生活质量:一项随机对照试验的12个月结果
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022 Jul 1;6(4):347-360. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.05.003. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) induced favorable neuromodulative outcome in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain syndrome in children.脊髓刺激(SCS)在治疗儿童慢性神经性疼痛综合征方面产生了良好的神经调节效果。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2025 Jan;54:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2025.02.007. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
9
[Clinical, electrophysiological and skin biopsy studies of peripheral neuropathy with small fibers involvement: a report of 34 cases].[伴有小纤维受累的周围神经病的临床、电生理及皮肤活检研究:34例报告]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Nov 25;94(43):3397-401.
10
Comparison of clinical outcomes associated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or conventional medical management (CMM) for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较脊髓刺激 (SCS) 与常规药物治疗 (CMM) 治疗慢性疼痛的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):2029-2041. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07716-2. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a review of current management options and a potential role for scrambler therapy.化疗引起的周围神经病变的治疗:当前管理选项综述及扰频疗法的潜在作用
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 7;6:1607102. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1607102. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcome After Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者硬膜外脊髓刺激后的临床结果
Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65753. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65753. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
A scoping review of the use of minimally important difference of EQ-5D utility index and EQ-VAS scores in health technology assessment.运用 EQ-5D 效用指数和 EQ-VAS 评分的最小重要差值进行健康技术评估的范围性回顾。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Aug 13;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02272-9.
3
Systematic review reveals that EQ-5D minimally important differences vary with treatment type and may decrease with increasing baseline score.
系统评价显示,EQ-5D 最小重要差异随治疗类型而变化,且可能随基线评分的升高而降低。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;174:111487. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111487. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spasticity: a Systematic Review of the Literature.硬膜外脊髓电刺激治疗痉挛:文献系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:227-238.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.158. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
5
Minimal Clinically Important Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index and VAS after a Respiratory Muscle Training Program in Individuals Experiencing Long-Term Post-COVID-19 Symptoms.经历长期新冠后症状的个体在进行呼吸肌训练计划后,EQ-5D-5L指数和视觉模拟量表的最小临床重要差异
Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 13;11(9):2522. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092522.
6
Long-term efficacy of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: 24-Month results of a randomized controlled trial.高频(10 kHz)脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛的长期疗效:一项随机对照试验的 24 个月结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Sep;203:110865. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110865. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
7
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: The Need for New Approaches.疼痛性糖尿病神经病变:对新方法的需求
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):159-167. doi: 10.1177/19322968221132252. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Chronic Painful Polyneuropathy: A Potential Modulator for Small Nerve Fiber Regeneration.慢性疼痛性多发性神经病中的背根神经节刺激:小神经纤维再生的潜在调节因子
Neuromodulation. 2023 Dec;26(8):1772-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.455. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
9
Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Neurostimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.系统评价和网络荟萃分析神经刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Oct 1;45(10):2466-2475. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0932.
10
Meaningful values of the EQ-5D-3L in patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty.初次膝关节置换患者EQ-5D-3L的有效数值。
Bone Joint Res. 2022 Sep;11(9):619-628. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.119.BJR-2022-0054.R1.