Suppr超能文献

基于阿帕替尼的方案在转移性三阴性乳腺癌中的有效性和安全性的真实世界研究。

A real-world study of the effectiveness and safety of apatinib-based regimens in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29, Xinquan Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou, Fujian province, 350001, China.

Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No.91, Fuma Road, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, Fujian province, 350014, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11790-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This investigation sought to examine the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib used alongside chemotherapy in the clinical management of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) within a real-world setting, whilst comparing the outcomes with those treated solely with chemotherapy.

METHODS

This case series study analyzed clinical data and treatment outcomes of 163 patients with metastatic TNBC who underwent rescue treatment at the Medical Oncology Department of Clinical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, School of Fujian Medical University, China, between October 2011 and January 2023. All the patients underwent rescue treatment with either chemotherapy alone or apatinib (250 mg/day) combined with chemotherapy. The study's primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety profiles.

RESULTS

The study was designed to compare two groups [1]. Out of the 163 TNBC patients who participated in the study, 107 individuals (65.6%) received treatment based on chemotherapy, whereas 56 patients (34.4%) were given treatment based on a combination of low-dose apatinib (250 mg/day) and other treatments, including chemotherapy. After propensity score matching (PSM), the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received apatinib-based treatment were 50.0 and 90.0%, respectively, while they were 6.7 and 20.0%, respectively, for the chemotherapy-based group (P < 0.001). The group that received apatinib-based treatment showed superior results in both PFS and OS compared to the group that received chemotherapy. The median PFS and OS for the apatinib-based group were 7.8 and 20.3 months, respectively, while they were only 2.2 months and 9.0 months, respectively, for the chemotherapy-based group (P < 0.001) [2]. Patients who were administered combo therapies, including PD-1 inhibitors, were excluded. In total, 97 patients received chemotherapy alone, while 34 patients were treated with apatinib in combination with chemotherapy. After propensity score matching (PSM), the ORR and DCR for the total group who received combo therapies were 44.4 and 81.5%, respectively, while they were 11.1 and 22.2%, respectively, for the chemotherapy alone group (P < 0.001). The group receiving both apatinib and chemotherapy displayed notable advantages over the group solely receiving chemotherapy in regards to PFS and OS for the entirety of the population. The PFS was found to be 7.8 months in comparison to 2.1 months (P < 0.001) and the OS was 21.1 months in contrast to 9.0 months (P < 0.001). Apatinib combined with chemotherapy induced grade 3/4 hematological toxicities, including neutropenia (8.8%) and thrombocytopenia (2.9%). Additionally, non-hematological toxicities were commonly observed, such as Hand-foot syndrome (35.3%), proteinuria (26.5%), hypertension (61.8%), higher alanine aminotransferase levels (26.5%), and fatigue (35.3%). The most frequent non-hematological grade 3/4 toxicities were Hand-foot syndrome (2.9%) and hypertension (5.9%). The study did not report any fatal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of low-dose apatinib with chemotherapy has proven to be more effective than chemotherapy alone in treating metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Additionally, the occurrence of grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities was significantly lower compared to the recommended dose of apatinib.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨低剂量阿帕替尼联合化疗在真实世界环境下治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的疗效和安全性,并与单纯化疗进行比较。

方法

本病例系列研究分析了 2011 年 10 月至 2023 年 1 月期间,福建医科大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤内科收治的 163 例转移性 TNBC 患者的临床数据和治疗结果。所有患者均接受化疗或阿帕替尼(250mg/天)联合化疗的挽救治疗。本研究的主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和安全性。

结果

本研究设计了两组对比[1]。在参与研究的 163 例 TNBC 患者中,107 例(65.6%)患者接受了基于化疗的治疗,56 例(34.4%)患者接受了基于低剂量阿帕替尼(250mg/天)联合其他治疗,包括化疗的治疗。经过倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,接受阿帕替尼治疗的晚期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为 50.0%和 90.0%,而接受化疗的患者分别为 6.7%和 20.0%(P<0.001)[2]。与接受化疗的患者相比,接受阿帕替尼治疗的患者在 PFS 和 OS 方面均表现出更好的结果。阿帕替尼治疗组的中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 7.8 个月和 20.3 个月,而化疗组分别为 2.2 个月和 9.0 个月(P<0.001)[2]。接受 PD-1 抑制剂联合治疗的患者被排除在外。共有 97 例患者接受单纯化疗,34 例患者接受阿帕替尼联合化疗。经过倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,联合治疗组的总 ORR 和 DCR 分别为 44.4%和 81.5%,而单纯化疗组分别为 11.1%和 22.2%(P<0.001)[3]。与单纯化疗组相比,联合阿帕替尼和化疗的患者在全人群的 PFS 和 OS 方面表现出显著优势。PFS 为 7.8 个月,而化疗组为 2.1 个月(P<0.001),OS 为 21.1 个月,而化疗组为 9.0 个月(P<0.001)。阿帕替尼联合化疗引起 3/4 级血液学毒性,包括中性粒细胞减少症(8.8%)和血小板减少症(2.9%)。此外,还观察到常见的非血液学毒性,如手足综合征(35.3%)、蛋白尿(26.5%)、高血压(61.8%)、较高的丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平(26.5%)和疲劳(35.3%)。最常见的 3/4 级非血液学毒性是手足综合征(2.9%)和高血压(5.9%)。该研究未报告任何致命的不良反应。

结论

低剂量阿帕替尼联合化疗在治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)方面比单纯化疗更有效,且毒性发生率明显低于阿帕替尼推荐剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1bd/10768098/f9c843da9b9c/12885_2023_11790_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验