Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX79409, USA.
Center for Natural Resource Technology Information, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX 77840, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae003.
Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbial (DFM) mixtures on intake, nutrient digestibility, feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation profile, and ruminal degradation kinetics of beef steers were evaluated. Crossbred Angus ruminally cannulated steers (n = 6; body weight [BW] = 520 ± 30 kg) were used in a duplicated 3 × 3 Latin square design and offered a steam-flaked corn-based finisher diet to ad libitum intake for 3, 28-d periods. Treatments were 1) Control (no DFM, lactose carrier only); 2) Treat-A (Lactobacillus animalis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus licheniformis), at 1:1:1:3 ratio, respectively; totaling 6 × 109 CFU (50 mg)/animal-daily minimum; and 3) Treat-B, the same DFM combination, but doses at 1:1:3:1 ratio. Bacterial counts were ~30% greater than the minimum expected. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with the model including the fixed effect of treatment and the random effects of square, period, and animal (square). For repeated measure variables, the fixed effects of treatment, time, and their interaction, and the random effects of square, period, animal (square), and animal (treatment) were used. Preplanned contrasts comparing Control × Treat-A or Treat-B were performed. Intake and major feeding behavior variables were not affected (P ≥ 0.17) by treatments. Steers offered Treat-A had an increased (P = 0.04) ADF digestibility compared with Control. Steers offered Treat-A experienced daily 300 min less (P = 0.04) time under ruminal pH 5.6, a greater (P = 0.04) ruminal pH average and NH3-N concentration (P = 0.05) and tended (P = 0.06) to have a lower ruminal temperature compared to Control. Ruminal VFA was not affected (P ≥ 0.38) by treatments. Steers offered Treat-A increased (P = 0.02) and tended (P = 0.08) to increase the ruminal effective degradable NDF and ADF fractions of the diet-substrate, respectively. When the forage-substrate (low quality) was incubated, steers offered Treat-A tended (P = 0.09) to increase the effective degradable hemicellulose fraction compared to Control. In this experiment, the bacterial combinations did not affect intake and feeding behavior, while the combination with a greater proportion of B. licheniformis (Treat-A) elicited an improved core-fiber digestibility and a healthier ruminal pH pattern, in which the ruminal environment showed to be more prone to induce the effective degradability of fiber fractions, while also releasing more NH3-N.
本研究旨在评估细菌直接饲喂微生物(DFM)混合物对肉牛采食量、养分消化率、采食行为、瘤胃发酵特性和瘤胃降解动力学的影响。选用 6 头装有瘤胃瘘管的杂交安格斯育肥牛(体重[BW]为 520±30kg),采用 3×3 拉丁方设计,在 3、28d 两个周期内自由采食蒸汽压片玉米基础精料。处理组分别为:1)对照组(不添加 DFM,仅添加乳糖载体);2)处理 A(动物乳杆菌、丙酸弗雷登斯氏菌、枯草芽孢杆菌和地衣芽孢杆菌,比例分别为 1:1:1:3),最低日添加活菌数为 6×109 CFU(50mg)/头;3)处理 B,相同的 DFM 组合,但剂量比为 1:1:3:1。细菌计数比预期最低值高出约 30%。数据采用 SAS 的 GLIMMIX 程序进行分析,模型包括处理的固定效应和方、周期和动物(方)的随机效应。对于重复测量变量,采用处理、时间及其相互作用的固定效应,以及方、周期、动物(方)和动物(处理)的随机效应。进行了对照比较 Control×Treat-A 或 Treat-B 的预设计对比。处理对采食量和主要采食行为变量无影响(P≥0.17)。与对照组相比,饲喂处理 A 的牛的 ADF 消化率增加(P=0.04)。与对照组相比,饲喂处理 A 的牛每天减少 300min(P=0.04)处于瘤胃 pH 5.6 以下,瘤胃平均 pH 和 NH3-N 浓度更高(P=0.04),瘤胃温度更低(P=0.06)。瘤胃 VFA 不受处理影响(P≥0.38)。与对照组相比,饲喂处理 A 的牛增加(P=0.02)并倾向于(P=0.08)增加日粮有效可降解 NDF 和 ADF 纤维部分。当饲料底物(低质量)孵育时,与对照组相比,饲喂处理 A 的牛有效可降解半纤维素部分增加(P=0.09)。在本实验中,细菌组合并未影响采食量和采食行为,而含有更高比例地衣芽孢杆菌(处理 A)的组合可提高核心纤维消化率,并改善瘤胃 pH 模式,表明瘤胃环境更倾向于诱导纤维部分的有效降解,同时释放更多的 NH3-N。