Institute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 6;29(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01616-3.
Body temperature (BT) is routinely measured and can be controlled in critical care settings. BT can impact patient outcome, but the relationship between BT and mortality has not been well-established.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on the MIMIC-IV (N = 43,537) and eICU (N = 75,184) datasets. The primary outcome and exposure variables were hospital mortality and first 48-h median BT, respectively. Generalized additive models were used to model the associations between exposures and outcomes, while adjusting for patient age, sex, APS-III, SOFA, and Charlson comorbidity scores, temperature gap, as well as ventilation, vasopressor, steroids, and dialysis usage. We conducted subgroup analysis according to ICU setting, diagnoses, and demographics.
Optimal BT was 37 °C for the general ICU and subgroup populations. A 10% increase in the proportion of time that BT was within the 36-38 °C range was associated with reduced hospital mortality risk in both MIMIC-IV (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.90-0.93) and eICU (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.85-0.87). On the other hand, a 10% increase in the proportion of time when BT < 36 °C was associated with increased mortality risk in both MIMIC-IV (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.06-1.10) and eICU (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.16-1.19). Similarly, a 10% increase in the proportion of time when BT > 38 °C was associated with increased mortality risk in both MIMIC-IV (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.07-1.12) and eICU (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.08-1.11). All patient subgroups tested consistently showed an optimal temperature within the 36-38 °C range.
A BT of 37 °C is associated with the lowest mortality risk among ICU patients. Further studies to explore the causal relationship between the optimal BT and mortality should be conducted and may help with establishing guidelines for active BT management in critical care settings.
体温(BT)在重症监护环境中通常会被测量并进行控制。BT 会影响患者的预后,但 BT 与死亡率之间的关系尚未得到充分证实。
基于 MIMIC-IV(N=43537)和 eICU(N=75184)数据集进行回顾性队列研究。主要结局和暴露变量分别为医院死亡率和前 48 小时中位数 BT。使用广义加性模型来对暴露和结局之间的关联进行建模,同时调整患者年龄、性别、APS-III、SOFA 和 Charlson 合并症评分、温度差以及通气、血管加压药、类固醇和透析的使用情况。我们根据 ICU 设置、诊断和人口统计学特征进行了亚组分析。
普通 ICU 和亚组人群的最佳 BT 为 37°C。BT 在 36-38°C 范围内的比例增加 10%,与 MIMIC-IV(OR 0.91;95%CI 0.90-0.93)和 eICU(OR 0.86;95%CI 0.85-0.87)的医院死亡率降低相关。另一方面,BT<36°C 的比例增加 10%,与 MIMIC-IV(OR 1.08;95%CI 1.06-1.10)和 eICU(OR 1.18;95%CI 1.16-1.19)的死亡率增加相关。同样,BT>38°C 的比例增加 10%,与 MIMIC-IV(OR 1.09;95%CI 1.07-1.12)和 eICU(OR 1.09;95%CI 1.08-1.11)的死亡率增加相关。所有测试的患者亚组均显示 36-38°C 范围内的最佳温度。
BT 为 37°C 时与 ICU 患者的最低死亡率相关。应进一步开展研究以探索最佳 BT 与死亡率之间的因果关系,这可能有助于制定重症监护环境中主动 BT 管理的指南。