Comparison of gastric inflammation and metaplasia induced by or colonization in mice.

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most diagnosed cancer in the world. Infection by the bacteria (HP) is associated with approximately 75% of gastric cancer cases. HP infection induces chronic gastric inflammation, damaging the stomach and fostering carcinogenesis. Most mechanistic studies on induced gastric cancer initiation are performed in mice and utilize either mouse-adapted strains of HP or the natural mouse pathogen (HF). Each of these infection models is associated with strengths and weaknesses. Here, we identified the differences in immunogenicity and gastric pathological changes associated with HP and HF infection in mice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PMSS1 HP strain or with the CS1 HF strain were co-cultured with mouse peritoneal macrophages to assess their immunostimulatory effects. C57BL/6J mice were infected with HP or HF, and gastric inflammation, atrophy, and metaplasia development were assessed 2 months post-infection.

RESULTS

HP and HF induced similar cytokine production from cultured mouse peritoneal macrophages. HP-infected mice caused modest inflammation within both the gastric corpus and antrum and did not induce significant atrophy within the gastric corpus. In contrast, HF induced significant inflammation throughout the gastric corpus and antrum. Moreover, HF infection was associated with significant atrophy of the chief and parietal cell compartments and induced expression of pyloric metaplasia markers.

CONCLUSIONS

HP is poorly immunogenic compared to HF. HF induces dramatic CD4+ T cell activation, which is associated with increased gastric cancer risk in humans. Thus, HP studies in mice are better suited for studies on colonization, while HF is more strongly suited for pathogenesis and cancer initiation studies.