Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0001524. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00015-24. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
Gastric cancer is the fifth most diagnosed cancer in the world. Infection by the bacteria (HP) is associated with approximately 75% of gastric cancer cases. HP infection induces chronic gastric inflammation, damaging the stomach and fostering carcinogenesis. Most mechanistic studies on gastric cancer initiation are performed in mice and utilize either mouse-adapted strains of HP or the natural mouse pathogen (HF). Here, we identified the differences in gastric inflammation, atrophy, and metaplasia associated with HP and HF infection in mice. PMSS1 HP strain or the CS1 HF strain were co-cultured with mouse peritoneal macrophages to assess their immunostimulatory effects. HP and HF induced similar cytokine production from cultured mouse peritoneal macrophages revealing that both bacteria exhibit similar immunostimulatory effects . Next, C57BL/6J mice were infected with HP or HF and were assessed 2 months post-infection. HP-infected mice caused modest inflammation within both the gastric corpus and antrum, and did not induce significant atrophy within the gastric corpus. In contrast, HF induced significant inflammation throughout the gastric corpus and antrum. Moreover, HF infection was associated with significant atrophy of the chief and parietal cell compartments and induced the expression of pyloric metaplasia (PM) markers. HP is poorly immunogenic compared to HF. HF induces dramatic CD4+ T cell activation, which is associated with increased gastric cancer risk in humans. Thus, HP studies in mice are better suited for studies on colonization, while HF is more strongly suited for studies on the effects of gastric inflammation on tumorigenesis. .
Mouse infection models with species are widely used to study pathogenesis and gastric cancer initiation. However, is not a natural mouse pathogen, and mouse-adapted strains are poorly immunogenic. In contrast, is a natural mouse pathogen that induces robust gastric inflammation and is often used in mice to investigate gastric cancer initiation. Although both bacterial strains are widely used, their disease pathogenesis in mice differs dramatically. However, few studies have directly compared the pathogenesis of these bacterial species in mice, and the contrasting features of these two models are not clearly defined. This study directly compares the gastric inflammation, atrophy, and metaplasia development triggered by the widely used PMSS1 and CS1 . felis strains in mice. It serves as a useful resource for researchers to select the experimental model best suited for their studies.
胃癌是全球第五大常见癌症。细菌(幽门螺杆菌)感染与大约 75%的胃癌病例有关。幽门螺杆菌感染会引起慢性胃炎症,损害胃并促进癌变。大多数关于胃癌发生的机制研究都是在小鼠中进行的,并且使用的是经小鼠适应的幽门螺杆菌株或天然小鼠病原体(幽门螺旋杆菌)。在这里,我们确定了与幽门螺杆菌和幽门螺旋杆菌感染相关的小鼠胃炎症、萎缩和化生的差异。PMSS1 幽门螺杆菌株或 CS1 幽门螺旋杆菌株与小鼠腹膜巨噬细胞共培养,以评估其免疫刺激作用。幽门螺杆菌和幽门螺旋杆菌诱导培养的小鼠腹膜巨噬细胞产生类似的细胞因子,表明这两种细菌都具有类似的免疫刺激作用。接下来,将 C57BL/6J 小鼠用幽门螺杆菌或幽门螺旋杆菌感染,并在感染后 2 个月进行评估。幽门螺杆菌感染的小鼠在胃体和胃窦都引起了适度的炎症,但没有在胃体引起明显的萎缩。相比之下,幽门螺旋杆菌感染引起胃体和胃窦的广泛炎症。此外,幽门螺旋杆菌感染与主细胞和壁细胞区室的显著萎缩以及诱导幽门化生(PM)标志物的表达有关。与幽门螺旋杆菌相比,幽门螺杆菌的免疫原性较差。幽门螺旋杆菌诱导强烈的 CD4+T 细胞激活,这与人类胃癌风险增加有关。因此,小鼠中幽门螺杆菌的研究更适合于定植研究,而幽门螺旋杆菌则更适合于研究胃炎症对肿瘤发生的影响。。
有 物种的小鼠感染模型广泛用于研究 发病机制和胃癌的发生。然而, 不是天然的小鼠病原体,而经小鼠适应的 菌株免疫原性较差。相比之下, 是一种天然的小鼠病原体,可引起强烈的胃炎症,常用于小鼠中研究胃癌的发生。尽管这两种细菌株都被广泛使用,但它们在小鼠中的疾病发病机制有很大的不同。然而,很少有研究直接比较这两种细菌在小鼠中的发病机制,并且这两种模型的对比特征也没有明确界定。本研究直接比较了广泛使用的 PMSS1 和 CS1 。在小鼠中引发的胃炎症、萎缩和化生的发展。它为研究人员提供了一个有用的资源,以便选择最适合其研究的实验模型。