Stavraky K M, Kincade J E, Stewart M A, Donner A P
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(3):237-44. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90159-7.
Previous studies have suggested that cancer patients of low socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer short and long-term survival than cancer patients of higher SES. In this study male and female patients between the ages of 25 and 70, admitted to two Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation Clinics with newly diagnosed cancers of a number of common sites, were interviewed to obtain information on education and occupation, and chronic illnesses other than cancer. Information on stage of disease at diagnosis, exact pathologic diagnosis, date of diagnosis, and treatment before and after admission to the clinic was obtained from clinic charts. Using multiple logistic regression analysis to control for the effect of stage and other variables, there was no convincing evidence that cancer patients of low SES measured by either education or occupation had a less favourable outcome at one year after diagnosis from cancers of all sites combined or lung cancer specifically. The data suggested that any single measure of SES affects males and females differently.
先前的研究表明,社会经济地位(SES)较低的癌症患者在短期和长期生存方面比SES较高的癌症患者更差。在本研究中,对年龄在25岁至70岁之间、因多种常见部位的新诊断癌症而入住安大略癌症治疗与研究基金会两家诊所的男性和女性患者进行了访谈,以获取有关教育和职业以及除癌症外的慢性病的信息。从诊所病历中获取了诊断时疾病分期、确切病理诊断、诊断日期以及入院前后治疗的信息。使用多元逻辑回归分析来控制分期和其他变量的影响,没有令人信服的证据表明,以教育或职业衡量的低SES癌症患者在所有部位癌症合并或特定肺癌诊断后一年的预后较差。数据表明,SES的任何单一衡量指标对男性和女性的影响不同。