Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA (A.M.G.).
Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.D., X.Y., S.T.S.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jan;17(1):e010200. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010200. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
Following regulatory approval, medical devices may be used "off-label." Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated to reduce recurrent stroke but has been proposed for other indications, including migraine, transient ischemic attack, and diving decompression illness. We sought to evaluate PFO closure rates and indications relative to the timing of regulatory approval and publication of key randomized trials.
We performed a retrospective cohort study using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse of US commercial insurance enrollees from 2006 to 2019. We quantified PFO closure among individuals with ≥2 years of preprocedure coverage to establish indications, classified hierarchically as stroke/systemic embolism, migraine, transient ischemia attack, or other.
We identified 5315 patients undergoing PFO closure (51.8% female, 29.2%≥60 years old), which increased from 4.75 per 100 000 person-years in 2006 to 6.60 per 100 000 person-years in 2019. Patients aged ≥60 years accounted for 29.2% of closures. Procedure volumes corresponded weakly with supportive clinical publications and device approval. Among patients with PFO closure, 58.6% underwent closure for stroke/systemic embolism, 10.2% for transient ischemia attack, 8.8% for migraine, and 22.4% for other indications; 17.6% of patients had atrial fibrillation at baseline; and 11.9% developed atrial fibrillation postprocedure. Those aged ≥60 years and male were less likely to undergo closure for migraine than stroke/systemic embolism.
From 2006 to 2019, PFO closure use was consistently low and corresponded weakly with clinical trial publications and regulatory status. Nearly half of patients underwent PFO closure for indications unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration. Regulators and payers should coordinate mechanisms to promote utilization for approved indications to ensure patient safety and should facilitate clinical trials for other possible indications.
在监管部门批准后,医疗器械可能会被“超适应证使用”。卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵术被用于降低复发性卒中的风险,但也被提议用于偏头痛、短暂性脑缺血发作和潜水减压病等其他适应证。我们试图评估 PFO 封堵术的应用率和适应证与监管部门批准和关键随机试验发表的时间之间的关系。
我们使用 2006 年至 2019 年美国商业保险参保者的 OptumLabs 数据仓库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们对至少有 2 年术前覆盖的个体进行 PFO 封堵术,以确定适应证,并按卒中/系统性栓塞、偏头痛、短暂性脑缺血发作或其他进行分层分类。
我们共纳入 5315 例接受 PFO 封堵术的患者(51.8%为女性,29.2%≥60 岁),2006 年的 PFO 封堵术例数为每 100000 人年 4.75 例,2019 年增至每 100000 人年 6.60 例。≥60 岁的患者占封堵术患者的 29.2%。手术量与支持性临床研究出版物和设备批准之间存在弱相关性。在接受 PFO 封堵术的患者中,58.6%因卒中/系统性栓塞行封堵术,10.2%因短暂性脑缺血发作行封堵术,8.8%因偏头痛行封堵术,22.4%因其他适应证行封堵术;基线时 17.6%的患者有房颤,11.9%的患者术后出现房颤。≥60 岁和男性患者因偏头痛而行 PFO 封堵术的可能性低于卒中/系统性栓塞。
2006 年至 2019 年,PFO 封堵术的应用率一直较低,与临床试验出版物和监管状况的相关性较弱。近一半的患者因食品和药物管理局未批准的适应证而行 PFO 封堵术。监管机构和支付方应协调机制,促进批准适应证的应用,以确保患者安全,并为其他可能的适应证开展临床试验。