Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jul;17(7):1057-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
In the Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure (CASTLE-AF) trial, catheter ablation reduced the risk of death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with atrial fibrillation and HF by 40%.
The study aimed to assess the generalizability of CASTLE-AF to routine clinical practice.
Using a large US administrative database, we identified 289,831 patients with atrial fibrillation and HF treated with ablation (n = 7465) or medical therapy alone (n = 282,366) from January 1, 2008, through August 31, 2018. Patients were divided into 3 groups on the basis of trial eligibility: (1) eligible for CASTLE-AF, (2) failing to meet the inclusion criteria, and (3) meeting at least 1 of the exclusion criteria. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to balance ablated and drug-treated patients on 90 baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare ablation with medical therapy for the primary outcome of a composite end point of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.
Only 7.8% of patients would have been eligible for the trial; 91.0% failed to meet the trial inclusion criteria; and 15.5% met the exclusion criteria. Ablation was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome in the overall cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.87; P < .001), in the trial-eligible cohort (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.96; P = .01), and in patients who failed to meet inclusion criteria (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.73-0.86; P < .001) but not in patients who met the exclusion criteria (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.81-1.17). The relative risk reduction was consistent regardless of whether patients had HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
The benefit associated with ablation appears to be more modest in practice than that reported in the CASTLE-AF trial.
在房颤伴心力衰竭(CASTLE-AF)试验中,导管消融使房颤伴心力衰竭患者的死亡和心力衰竭(HF)住院风险降低了 40%。
本研究旨在评估 CASTLE-AF 在常规临床实践中的推广性。
使用美国大型行政数据库,我们从 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 31 日,确定了 289831 例接受消融(n=7465)或单独药物治疗(n=282366)的房颤伴心力衰竭患者。根据试验纳入标准,患者被分为 3 组:(1)符合 CASTLE-AF 标准,(2)不符合纳入标准,(3)符合至少 1 项排除标准。采用倾向评分重叠加权法对 90 项基线特征进行平衡,比较消融与药物治疗的主要复合终点(全因死亡率和 HF 住院率)。采用 Cox 比例风险回归比较消融与药物治疗。
仅有 7.8%的患者符合试验标准;91.0%的患者不符合试验纳入标准;15.5%的患者符合排除标准。消融与整体队列(风险比[HR]0.81;95%置信区间[CI]0.76-0.87;P<.001)、符合试验标准的队列(HR0.82;95%CI0.70-0.96;P=0.01)和不符合纳入标准的患者(HR0.79;95%CI0.73-0.86;P<.001)的主要结局风险降低相关,但与符合排除标准的患者(HR0.97;95%CI0.81-1.17)无关。无论患者是否有射血分数降低的心力衰竭,风险降低的相对幅度都是一致的。
与 CASTLE-AF 试验报告的结果相比,在实践中,消融带来的获益似乎要小一些。