Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Washington Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Center for Pain Relief, Seattle, Washington.
J Opioid Manag. 2023 Nov-Dec;19(6):543-554. doi: 10.5055/jom.0839.
To determine the effectiveness and safety of the University of Washington's buprenorphine cross-titration protocol for chronic pain in the outpatient setting.
Retrospective chart review was performed on 150 patients transitioned from full µ-opioid agonist therapy to buprenorphine using the University of Washington Medical Center Pain Clinic's cross-titration protocol between September 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, in an outpatient setting. Primary outcome was to determine the percentage of patients who completed the cross-titration and continued buprenorphine without full µ-opioid agonists 4 weeks after completion. Secondary outcomes included final buprenorphine dose, days needed to complete cross-titration, deviation rates from the protocol, and opioid-related adverse events.
Fifteen of 31 (48.4 percent) included patients successfully converted to buprenorphine. Median duration of successful cross-titration was 29 days (interquartile range 19-57). Average end-titration dose for patients on buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual films was 7.9 ± 5.7 mg/day, while for buprenorphine transdermal (TD) patches, it was 11.9 ± 4.8 mcg/h. Morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) prior to induction varied widely. All patients transitioned to TD buprenorphine were taking ≤30 mg MEDD. Patients previously taking >120 mg MEDD stabilized on 8-16 mg/day buprenorphine. Most common reasons for cross-titration failure were inadequate pain control and intolerable adverse effects.
The University of Washington's buprenorphine cross-titration protocol for chronic pain was successful in about half of included patients undergoing conversion from chronic full µ-opioid agonist therapy and generally well tolerated. Clinical responses were widely variable, and many required slower taper and higher end-titration buprenorphine dose than anticipated. Although protocols provide structure for cross-titration, each course should be monitored closely and individualized.
确定华盛顿大学的丁丙诺啡交叉滴定方案在慢性疼痛门诊环境中的有效性和安全性。
对 2020 年 9 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间,在华盛顿大学医学中心疼痛诊所,使用丁丙诺啡交叉滴定方案从全 μ 阿片激动剂治疗转换的 150 例慢性疼痛门诊患者进行回顾性图表审查。主要结果是确定完成交叉滴定并在完成后 4 周内继续使用丁丙诺啡而无需全 μ 阿片激动剂的患者百分比。次要结果包括最终丁丙诺啡剂量、完成交叉滴定所需的天数、偏离方案的比率以及阿片类药物相关不良事件。
31 例患者中,有 15 例(48.4%)成功转换为丁丙诺啡。成功交叉滴定的中位数持续时间为 29 天(四分位距 19-57)。接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮舌下片的患者的平均终剂量为 7.9 ± 5.7 mg/天,而接受丁丙诺啡透皮(TD)贴片的患者的平均终剂量为 11.9 ± 4.8 mcg/h。诱导前的吗啡等效日剂量(MEDD)差异很大。所有转换为 TD 丁丙诺啡的患者均服用 ≤30 mg MEDD。之前服用 >120 mg MEDD 的患者稳定在 8-16 mg/天的丁丙诺啡。交叉滴定失败的最常见原因是疼痛控制不足和无法耐受的不良反应。
华盛顿大学的丁丙诺啡交叉滴定方案在接受慢性全 μ 阿片激动剂治疗转换的患者中约有一半取得了成功,并且通常耐受性良好。临床反应差异很大,许多患者需要比预期更慢的减药和更高的终滴定丁丙诺啡剂量。虽然方案为交叉滴定提供了结构,但每个疗程都应密切监测并个体化。