J Opioid Manag. 2024 Jul-Aug;20(4):B14. doi: 10.5055/bupe.24.rpj.1065.
Bone marrow transplant (BMT) offers potential cure for cancer and a spectrum of otherwise incur- able diseases. The BMT process can cause multi-systemic pain in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) refractory to high-dose opioid analgesics during BMT because of their pre-existing opioid-tolerance. Because of frequent pain resulting in hyperalgesia and chronic opioid use, SCD patients undergoing BMT often experience excruciating pain uncontrolled by exceedingly high-dose opioids with severe and intolerable adverse effects.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: There is a small but growing body of literature about the successful buprenorphine effect for SCD's chronic pain management that had failed sufficient pain relief by the traditional full-agonist opioids in the outpatient setting. However, the buprenorphine use for acute inpatient pain management has not been previously researched. Pilot prospective clinical trial with buprenorphine-based pain management for acute BMT-related pain was initiated for SCD patients' pain uncontrolled by full-agonist opioids. Procedures/data/observations: Buprenorphine was started as scheduled and as-needed analgesics, supplemented by full-agonist opioids upon consultation for uncontrolled BMT-related pain of SCD patients. Patients' 24-hour opioid requirement by morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD) were assessed at 3 time points: 1)immediately before pain escalation; 2)consultation; 3)discharge. MEDDs were compared to those of patients treated with full-agonist opioids only. Cases treated by full-agonist opioids (morphine/hydromorphone/fentanyl/methadone/oxycodone) had MEDD escalation by 1230-16300% by discharge compared to immediately before BMT-related pain escalation. Buprenorphine-supported cases had significantly smaller MEDD increase by 220-317%.
CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Our case series suggests superior pain control by adding Buprenorphine prior to opioid dose escalation during BMT for SCD. Buprenorphine may provide the advantageous effect for other patients with complex pain background and experiencing difficult pain management during BMT due to pre-existing hyperalgesia and high opioid-tolerance. The evidence for buprenorphine's analgesic effect is moderate but growing, and more randomized controlled trials comparing the buprenorphine and other standard opioids are needed.
骨髓移植(BMT)为癌症和一系列其他无法治愈的疾病提供了潜在的治愈方法。在 BMT 过程中,患有镰状细胞病(SCD)的患者可能会出现多系统疼痛,即使使用高剂量阿片类药物也无法缓解,因为他们已经存在阿片类药物耐受。由于频繁的疼痛导致痛觉过敏和慢性阿片类药物的使用,接受 BMT 的 SCD 患者经常经历剧烈疼痛,即使使用极高剂量的阿片类药物也无法控制,且伴有严重且无法耐受的不良反应。
目的/假设:有一小部分文献表明,丁丙诺啡在门诊环境中对 SCD 的慢性疼痛管理有效,而传统的完全激动剂阿片类药物对其疼痛缓解效果不佳。然而,丁丙诺啡在急性住院疼痛管理中的应用尚未得到研究。因此,对于无法通过完全激动剂阿片类药物控制的 SCD 患者,我们启动了一项前瞻性临床研究,旨在评估丁丙诺啡在 BMT 相关疼痛中的应用。
方法/程序/观察:按照计划和按需给予丁丙诺啡作为止痛药物,如果 SCD 患者的 BMT 相关疼痛仍未得到控制,则在咨询后补充完全激动剂阿片类药物。在 3 个时间点评估患者的 24 小时阿片类药物需求,以吗啡等效日剂量(MEDD)表示:1)疼痛加重前;2)咨询时;3)出院时。将 MEDD 与仅接受完全激动剂阿片类药物治疗的患者进行比较。接受完全激动剂阿片类药物(吗啡/氢吗啡酮/芬太尼/美沙酮/羟考酮)治疗的患者,与 BMT 相关疼痛加重前相比,MEDD 分别增加了 1230-16300%,而接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者,MEDD 增加了 220-317%。
结论/应用:我们的病例系列研究表明,在 SCD 患者接受 BMT 前,增加丁丙诺啡可以更好地控制疼痛,减少阿片类药物剂量的增加。由于预先存在的痛觉过敏和高阿片类药物耐受,丁丙诺啡可能为其他具有复杂疼痛背景和在 BMT 期间经历困难疼痛管理的患者提供有利的效果。丁丙诺啡的镇痛效果的证据是中等但不断增加的,需要更多比较丁丙诺啡与其他标准阿片类药物的随机对照试验。