Suppr超能文献

与癌症筛查假阳性结果相关的健康状态效用值。

Health State Utilities Associated with False-Positive Cancer Screening Results.

作者信息

Matza Louis S, Howell Timothy A, Fung Eric T, Janes Sam M, Seiden Michael, Hackshaw Allan, Nadauld Lincoln, Karn Hayley, Chung Karen C

机构信息

Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.

GRAIL, LLC., a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Mar;8(2):263-276. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00443-w. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early cancer detection can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality rates. Novel cancer screening approaches, including multi-cancer early detection tests, have been developed. Cost-utility analyses will be needed to examine their value, and these models require health state utilities. The purpose of this study was to estimate the disutility (i.e., decrease in health state utility) associated with false-positive cancer screening results.

METHODS

In composite time trade-off interviews using a 1-year time horizon, UK general population participants valued 10 health state vignettes describing cancer screening with true-negative or false-positive results. Each false-positive vignette described a common diagnostic pathway following a false-positive result suggesting lung, colorectal, breast, or pancreatic cancer. Every pathway ended with a negative result (no cancer detected). The disutility of each false positive was calculated as the difference between the true-negative and each false-positive health state, and because of the 1-year time horizon, each disutility can be interpreted as a quality-adjusted life-year decrement associated with each type of false-positive experience.

RESULTS

A total of 203 participants completed interviews (49.8% male; mean age = 42.0 years). The mean (SD) utility for the health state describing a true-negative result was 0.958 (0.065). Utilities for false-positive health states ranged from 0.847 (0.145) to 0.932 (0.059). Disutilities for false positives ranged from - 0.031 to - 0.111 (- 0.041 to - 0.111 for lung cancer; - 0.079 for colorectal cancer; - 0.031 to - 0.067 for breast cancer; - 0.048 to - 0.088 for pancreatic cancer).

CONCLUSION

All false-positive results were associated with a disutility. Greater disutility was associated with more invasive follow-up diagnostic procedures, longer duration of uncertainty regarding the eventual diagnosis, and perceived severity of the suspected cancer type. Utility values estimated in this study would be useful for economic modeling examining the value of cancer screening procedures.

摘要

引言

早期癌症检测可显著改善患者预后并降低死亡率。包括多癌早期检测测试在内的新型癌症筛查方法已被开发出来。需要进行成本效益分析来评估它们的价值,而这些模型需要健康状态效用值。本研究的目的是估计与癌症筛查假阳性结果相关的负效用(即健康状态效用的降低)。

方法

在为期1年的综合时间权衡访谈中,英国普通人群参与者对10个描述癌症筛查真阴性或假阳性结果的健康状态 vignette 进行了评估。每个假阳性 vignette 描述了在提示肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌或胰腺癌的假阳性结果后的常见诊断路径。每条路径都以阴性结果(未检测到癌症)结束。每个假阳性的负效用计算为真阴性和每个假阳性健康状态之间的差异,由于为期1年的时间范围,每个负效用都可以解释为与每种假阳性经历相关的质量调整生命年减少。

结果

共有203名参与者完成了访谈(男性占49.8%;平均年龄 = 42.0岁)。描述真阴性结果的健康状态的平均(标准差)效用为0.958(0.065)。假阳性健康状态的效用范围为0.847(0.145)至0.932(0.059)。假阳性的负效用范围为 -0.031至 -0.111(肺癌为 -0.041至 -0.111;结直肠癌为 -0.079;乳腺癌为 -0.031至 -0.067;胰腺癌为 -0.048至 -0.088)。

结论

所有假阳性结果都与负效用相关。更大的负效用与更具侵入性的后续诊断程序、最终诊断的不确定性持续时间更长以及疑似癌症类型的感知严重程度相关。本研究中估计的效用值将有助于进行经济建模,以评估癌症筛查程序的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/10884390/b6f2f005e37d/41669_2023_443_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验