Suppr超能文献

公众对多癌种早期检测的看法:一项定性研究。

Public Perspectives on Multi-Cancer Early Detection: A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241291609. doi: 10.1177/10732748241291609.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multi-cancer early detection tests (MCEDs) have the potential to identify over 50 types of cancer from a blood sample, possibly transforming cancer screening paradigms. Studies on the safety and effectiveness of MCEDs are underway, but there is a paucity of research exploring public views on MCEDs. We sought to explore public perspectives and understanding on the use of MCEDs in patient care.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, qualitative study using one-on-one, semi-structured interviews. Residents of the United States aged 45-70 years old were recruited through a survey panel and purposively sampled to maximize racial diversity. Interviews explored understanding of MCEDs and perspectives on their use. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis with deductive coding and semi-quantification.

RESULTS

Among 27 participants, mean age was 62 years (range 48-70) and most (63%) were non-white. Most participants had completed at least one cancer screening (89%). Participants had a positive impression of MCEDs (85%) and found the concept easy to understand (88%). They were enthusiastic about the convenience of MCEDs (30%) and thought they would improve "cancer outcomes" by looking for multiple cancers (70%) and facilitating early detection (33%). Participants emphasized the need to balance these benefits against potential harms, including inaccuracy (96%), cost (92%), test-related anxiety (56%), and lack of evidence of effectiveness (22%). Participants favored that MCEDs be delivered in primary care (93%). Participants worried that the potential benefits of MCEDs might not be equitably distributed (44%).

CONCLUSIONS

Members of the US public in this study expressed an interest in using MCEDs but had concerns regarding cost, accuracy, and potential inequitable access to the tests. Findings suggest that MCEDs that are found to be safe and effective will be acceptable to patients as a part of primary care, and underscore public interest in improving this technology.

摘要

背景

多癌种早期检测(MCED)有可能通过血液样本检测出 50 多种癌症,可能会改变癌症筛查模式。目前正在进行 MCED 的安全性和有效性研究,但对于公众对 MCED 的看法的研究却很少。我们试图探讨公众对 MCED 在患者护理中的使用的看法和理解。

方法

我们采用了一项横断面、定性研究,使用一对一的半结构化访谈。通过调查小组招募了年龄在 45-70 岁的美国居民,并进行了有针对性的抽样,以最大限度地增加种族多样性。访谈内容包括对 MCED 的理解和对其使用的看法。使用主题分析、演绎编码和半定量分析对访谈进行分析。

结果

在 27 名参与者中,平均年龄为 62 岁(范围 48-70 岁),大多数(63%)是非白人。大多数参与者至少完成了一次癌症筛查(89%)。参与者对 MCED 有积极的印象(85%),认为这个概念很容易理解(88%)。他们对 MCED 的便利性感到热情(30%),并认为通过寻找多种癌症(70%)和促进早期检测(33%)可以改善“癌症结果”。参与者强调需要平衡这些益处与潜在的危害,包括不准确性(96%)、成本(92%)、与测试相关的焦虑(56%)和缺乏有效性证据(22%)。参与者赞成在初级保健中提供 MCED(93%)。参与者担心 MCED 的潜在益处可能不公平地分配(44%)。

结论

在这项研究中,美国公众对使用 MCED 表示感兴趣,但对成本、准确性和潜在不公平获得测试的机会表示担忧。研究结果表明,被发现安全有效的 MCED 将被患者接受为初级保健的一部分,并强调了公众对改善这项技术的兴趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e7c/11489936/359e1501c47b/10.1177_10732748241291609-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验