Suppr超能文献

体外机械循环支持选择的标准化方案的结果——左心室挑战方案。

The outcomes of a standardized protocol for extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support selection-left ventricular challenge protocol.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 6-7 Kishibeshinmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.

Department of Clinical Engineering, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Artif Organs. 2024 Dec;27(4):358-367. doi: 10.1007/s10047-023-01427-7. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

Abstract

There are no criteria for surgical mechanical circulatory system (MCS) selection for acute heart failure. Since 2021, we have utilized cardiopulmonary bypass system to assess patients' heart and lung condition to inform surgical MCS selection. we aimed to retrospectively analyze the outcomes of treatments administered using our protocol. We analyzed the data of 19 patients who underwent surgical MCS implantation. We compared patients' characteristics across the biventricular-assist device (BiVAD), central Y-Y extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), central ECMO, and left VAD (LVAD) systems. Patients' diagnoses included fulminant myocarditis (47.4%), dilated cardiomyopathy (21.1%), acute myocardial infarction (15.8%), infarction from aortic dissection (5.3%), doxorubicin-related cardiomyopathy (5.3%), and tachycardia-induced myocarditis (5.3%). Eight patients (42.1%) underwent LVAD implantation, 1 (5.2%) underwent central ECMO, 4 (21.1%) underwent BiVAD implantation, and 6 (31.6%) underwent central Y-Y ECMO. 48 h after surgery, both the pulmonary arterial and right atrial pressures were effectively controlled, with median values being 19.0 mmHg and 9.0 mmHg, respectively. No patients transitioned from LVAD to BiVAD in the delayed period. Cerebrovascular events occurred in 21.1%. Successful weaning was achieved in 11 patients (57.9%), and 5 patients (26.3%) were converted to durable LVAD. Two-year cumulative survival was 84.2%. Our protocol showed good results for device selection in patients with heart failure, and device selection according to this protocol enabled good control of the pulmonary and systemic circulations.

摘要

对于急性心力衰竭,目前尚无外科机械循环系统(MCS)选择的标准。自 2021 年以来,我们一直使用体外心肺旁路系统来评估患者的心肺状况,以告知外科 MCS 的选择。我们旨在回顾性分析使用我们的方案进行治疗的结果。我们分析了 19 名接受外科 MCS 植入术的患者的数据。我们比较了双心室辅助装置(BiVAD)、中心 Y-Y 体外膜氧合(ECMO)、中心 ECMO 和左心室辅助装置(LVAD)系统的患者特征。患者的诊断包括暴发性心肌炎(47.4%)、扩张型心肌病(21.1%)、急性心肌梗死(15.8%)、主动脉夹层引起的梗死(5.3%)、多柔比星相关心肌病(5.3%)和心动过速性心肌炎(5.3%)。8 名患者(42.1%)接受了 LVAD 植入,1 名(5.2%)接受了中心 ECMO,4 名(21.1%)接受了 BiVAD 植入,6 名(31.6%)接受了中心 Y-Y ECMO。手术后 48 小时,肺动脉和右心房压力均得到有效控制,中位数分别为 19.0mmHg 和 9.0mmHg。在延迟期,没有患者从 LVAD 转为 BiVAD。21.1%发生脑血管事件。11 名患者(57.9%)成功撤机,5 名患者(26.3%)转为永久性 LVAD。2 年累积生存率为 84.2%。我们的方案显示,该方案在心力衰竭患者中选择设备的效果良好,根据该方案选择设备可以很好地控制肺循环和体循环。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验