• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术与内镜治疗慢性胰腺炎疼痛的比较:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Surgery versus Endoscopy for the Management of Painful Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Professorial Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2024;41(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000535588. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1159/000535588
PMID:38190810
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Debate exists regarding the optimal treatment for painful chronic pancreatitis (CP). This meta-analysis aims to determine the outcomes of surgical intervention as compared to endoscopy in patients with painful CP.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Databases (1995 onwards) was done by two independent reviewers using PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcome was pain relief.

RESULTS

Among 8,479 studies, three were randomized trials, comprising a total of 199 patients. Compared with endoscopy, surgery was associated with a lower Izbicki score, both at medium term (mean difference (MD) 21.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.48-29.43, p < 0.00001) and long term (MD: 17.80, 95% CI: 8.36-27.23, p = 0.0002). A higher proportion of surgical patients had some sort of pain relief compared with those who had endoscopy, both at medium term (72% vs. 46%, RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.90, p = 0.0006) and long term (73% vs. 47%, RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.19-1.89, p = 0.0007). Complete pain relief was more common in the surgical group compared to the endoscopy group, both at medium term (33% vs. 17%, RR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.16-3.36, p = 0.01) and long term (35% vs. 18%, RR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.15-3.20, p = 0.01). The pooled crossover rate from endoscopy to surgery was 22% (22/99).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment in patients with painful CP leads to better pain control, requiring fewer interventions as compared to endoscopic treatment.

摘要

背景

对于疼痛性慢性胰腺炎(CP),哪种治疗方式最优仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在比较内镜治疗与手术治疗对疼痛性 CP 患者的疗效。

方法

通过对 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库(1995 年及以后)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,两位独立评审员使用 PRISMA 指南进行筛选。主要结局为疼痛缓解。

结果

在 8479 项研究中,有 3 项为随机试验,共纳入 199 名患者。与内镜治疗相比,手术治疗在中期(平均差值(MD):21.46,95%置信区间(CI):13.48-29.43,p < 0.00001)和长期(MD:17.80,95%CI:8.36-27.23,p = 0.0002)时,Izbicki 评分均更低。手术治疗的患者中,有某种程度疼痛缓解的比例高于内镜治疗的患者,中期(72%比 46%,RR:1.51,95%CI:1.19-1.90,p = 0.0006)和长期(73%比 47%,RR:1.50,95%CI:1.19-1.89,p = 0.0007)时均如此。与内镜治疗相比,手术治疗的患者在中期(33%比 17%,RR:1.97,95%CI:1.16-3.36,p = 0.01)和长期(35%比 18%,RR:1.92,95%CI:1.15-3.20,p = 0.01)时完全疼痛缓解的比例更高。内镜治疗转为手术治疗的患者比例为 22%(22/99)。

结论

与内镜治疗相比,手术治疗疼痛性 CP 患者的疼痛控制效果更好,需要的干预更少。

相似文献

1
Surgery versus Endoscopy for the Management of Painful Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.手术与内镜治疗慢性胰腺炎疼痛的比较:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Surg. 2024;41(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000535588. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
2
Endoscopic or surgical intervention for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis.针对疼痛性梗阻性慢性胰腺炎的内镜或手术干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 19;2015(3):CD007884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007884.pub3.
3
Endoscopic or surgical intervention for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis.针对疼痛性梗阻性慢性胰腺炎的内镜或手术干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD007884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007884.pub2.
4
Effect of Early Surgery vs Endoscopy-First Approach on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: The ESCAPE Randomized Clinical Trial.慢性胰腺炎患者早期手术与内镜优先治疗对疼痛的影响:ESCAPE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 21;323(3):237-247. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20967.
5
Pain relief in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic or surgical treatment? a systematic review with meta-analysis.慢性胰腺炎疼痛缓解:内镜或手术治疗?系统评价与荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4085-4094. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08515-w. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Endoscopy versus early surgery for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜与早期手术治疗慢性胰腺炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8753-8763. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09425-1. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
7
Surgical strategies in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.慢性胰腺炎治疗中的手术策略:随机对照试验的最新系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(9):e6220. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006220.
8
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection versus pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis.保留十二指肠的胰腺切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 3;2(2):CD011521. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011521.pub2.
9
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.
10
Antioxidant therapy for pain relief in patients with chronic pancreatitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.抗氧化治疗缓解慢性胰腺炎患者疼痛的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):521-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus block on the palliation of pain in chronic pancreatitis (EPOCH Trial): study protocol for a randomized multicenter sham-controlled trial {1}.内镜超声引导腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗慢性胰腺炎疼痛的疗效(EPOCH 试验):一项随机多中心假对照试验的研究方案{1}。
Trials. 2024 Oct 14;25(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08478-y.