Wang Simin, Zhang Tongyu, Du Lei, Hu Peng, Ye Ming, Sun Liyong, Hong Tao, Li Guilin, Zhang Peng, Zhang Hongqi, He Chuan
Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, China International Neuroscience Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jan 8:15910199231219212. doi: 10.1177/15910199231219212.
Although stent-assisted coiling embolization (SAC) has been associated with a higher risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, the use of SAC continues to rise for treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs). This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the context of RIAs.
We conducted a retrospective analysis at a single center, involving patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) between May 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups: the SAC group and the non-SAC (NSC) group. Patients in the SAC group received DAPT. We compared modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, along with hemorrhagic and ischemic complications, between the two groups to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT for SAC.
The study included a total of 541 patients, of whom 38 (7.0%) experienced hemorrhagic complications and 48 (8.9%) developed ischemic complications. Additionally, 99 (18.3%) and 84 (15.5%) had poor clinical outcomes at discharge and 6 months, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. Our analysis revealed that aneurysm location in the posterior circulation was a significant risk factor for an unfavorable prognosis when antiplatelet drugs were used following SAC ( = 0.025).
Administering antiplatelet drugs after SAC for RIAs has demonstrated both safety and effectiveness. However, caution should be exercised when considering this treatment strategy for RIAs located in the posterior circulation due to the potentially elevated risk.
尽管支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SAC)与缺血性和出血性并发症的较高风险相关,但SAC在治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤(RIA)中的应用仍在增加。本研究旨在评估双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在RIA治疗中的安全性和有效性。
我们在单一中心进行了一项回顾性分析,纳入了2017年5月1日至2021年12月31日期间患有动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)的患者。患者被分为两组:SAC组和非SAC(NSC)组。SAC组患者接受DAPT。我们比较了两组之间的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分以及出血和缺血性并发症,以评估DAPT用于SAC的安全性和有效性。
该研究共纳入541例患者,其中38例(7.0%)发生出血性并发症,48例(8.9%)发生缺血性并发症。此外,分别有99例(18.3%)和84例(15.5%)在出院时和6个月时临床结局不佳。然而,两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。我们的分析显示,SAC后使用抗血小板药物时,后循环动脉瘤的位置是预后不良的一个重要危险因素(=0.025)。
SAC后给予抗血小板药物治疗RIA已证明具有安全性和有效性。然而,由于风险可能升高,对于位于后循环的RIA考虑这种治疗策略时应谨慎。