• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗急性破裂脑动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:一项多中心前瞻性注册研究(SAVE)

The safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling for acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a multicenter prospective registry study (SAVE).

作者信息

Li Gaozhi, Ding Shenghao, Wang Jiale, Zheng Kuang, Li Wenshuai, Mao Guohua, Liu Xiaobo, Zhang Zheming, Jin Dianshi, Liu Lang, Guo Qinhua, Liu Qingyuan, Zhang Xiaohua, Samaniego Edgar A, Du Rose, Pan Yaohua, Wan Jieqing, Zhao Bing

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 1;111(6):3876-3885. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002357. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002357
PMID:40146285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12165586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) is a reasonable treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysms that are not amenable to primary coiling. However, the safety and efficacy of SAC for acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms need to be further determined.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SAC for acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients with acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms treated with SAC within 72 hours after presentation. The primary outcome was treatment-related thromboembolic complications within 30 days of treatment; the secondary outcomes were hemorrhagic complications and aneurysm recurrence. A favorable clinical outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0 to 2 at 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 315 patients, 278 patients with 278 acutely ruptured aneurysms were included in the study. Treatment-related thromboembolic complications occurred in 32 patients (11.5%), including nine (3.2%) patients with intraoperative thrombosis and 23 (8.3%) patients with postoperative ischemia. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 13 (4.7%) patients, including one (0.4%) patient with intraoperative hemorrhage and 12 (4.3%) patients with postoperative hemorrhage. Aneurysm rebleeding occurred in two (0.7%) patients. A total of 251 (251/275, 91.3%) patients had favorable clinical outcomes at the 6-month follow-up. The rate of aneurysm recurrence was 7.2%. Patients with a worse WFNS grade tended to have thromboembolic complications (21.2% vs. 10.2%, P  = 0.079) and hemorrhagic complications (12.1% vs. 3.7%, P  = 0.054). Treatment-related thromboembolic complications and hemorrhagic complications were independent predictors of unfavorable clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients had favorable clinical outcomes, with a low risk of intraoperative complications, aneurysm rebleeding, and a high rate of aneurysm occlusion. SAC for acutely ruptured aneurysms is a safe and effective procedure, especially in patients with good clinical conditions before treatment.

摘要

背景

支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SAC)是治疗无法进行初次弹簧圈栓塞的破裂性脑动脉瘤的一种合理方法。然而,SAC治疗急性破裂性脑动脉瘤的安全性和有效性仍需进一步确定。

目的

评估SAC治疗急性破裂性脑动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心研究,纳入了连续的急性破裂性脑动脉瘤患者,这些患者在就诊后72小时内接受了SAC治疗。主要结局是治疗后30天内与治疗相关的血栓栓塞并发症;次要结局是出血并发症和动脉瘤复发。良好的临床结局定义为治疗后6个月改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为0至2分。

结果

315例患者中,278例患有278个急性破裂性动脉瘤的患者被纳入研究。32例患者(11.5%)发生了与治疗相关的血栓栓塞并发症,包括9例(3.2%)术中血栓形成患者和23例(8.3%)术后缺血患者。13例(4.7%)患者发生了出血并发症,包括1例(0.4%)术中出血患者和12例(4.3%)术后出血患者。2例(0.7%)患者发生了动脉瘤再出血。在6个月的随访中,共有251例(251/275,91.3%)患者获得了良好的临床结局。动脉瘤复发率为7.2%。WFNS分级较差的患者更容易发生血栓栓塞并发症(21.2%对10.2%,P = 0.079)和出血并发症(12.1%对3.7%,P = 0.054)。与治疗相关的血栓栓塞并发症和出血并发症是不良临床结局的独立预测因素。

结论

大多数患者获得了良好的临床结局,术中并发症、动脉瘤再出血风险低,动脉瘤闭塞率高。SAC治疗急性破裂性动脉瘤是一种安全有效的方法,尤其是对于治疗前临床状况良好的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b50/12165586/3e459d369463/js9-111-3876-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b50/12165586/35d44c89233c/js9-111-3876-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b50/12165586/3e459d369463/js9-111-3876-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b50/12165586/35d44c89233c/js9-111-3876-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b50/12165586/3e459d369463/js9-111-3876-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling for acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a multicenter prospective registry study (SAVE).支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗急性破裂脑动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:一项多中心前瞻性注册研究(SAVE)
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 1;111(6):3876-3885. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002357. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coil embolization with periprocedural dual antiplatelet therapy for the treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术联合围手术期双联抗血小板治疗急性破裂颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 May 15;166(1):216. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06117-8.
3
Stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗急性破裂颅内动脉瘤:文献的定性、系统评价。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Aug;32(7):1232-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2478. Epub 2011 May 5.
4
Comparative Analysis of Stent-Assisted Versus Non-Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Management of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.支架辅助与非支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的比较分析:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Transl Stroke Res. 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1007/s12975-024-01314-0.
5
Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: a systematic review.Woven EndoBridge 装置治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤:系统评价。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Apr;14(4):366-370. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017613. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
6
Risk factors of short-term poor functional outcomes and long-term durability of ruptured large or giant intracranial aneurysms.大型或巨大型破裂颅内动脉瘤短期功能预后不良及长期耐久性的危险因素。
J Neurosurg. 2025 Jan 10;142(6):1776-1785. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.JNS24894. Print 2025 Jun 1.
7
Efficacy of Flow Diverter versus Stent-Assisted Coiling for Treating Small- and Medium-Sized Intracranial Wide-Neck Cystic Aneurysms.血流导向装置与支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗中小型颅内宽颈囊性动脉瘤的疗效比较
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jun;198:123990. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123990. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
8
Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的血管内栓塞术与神经外科夹闭术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD003085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub2.
9
Safety and effectiveness of microsurgical clipping, endovascular coiling, and stent assisted coiling for unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a systematic analysis of observational studies.未破裂前交通动脉动脉瘤显微夹闭、血管内弹簧圈栓塞和支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗的安全性和有效性:观察性研究的系统分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Aug;9(8):761-765. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012629. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
10
Stent-assisted coiling of acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysm: a multicenter prospective registry study (SAVE).支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗急性破裂脑动脉瘤:多中心前瞻性注册研究(SAVE)。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02800-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Stent-Assisted Versus Non-Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Management of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.支架辅助与非支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的比较分析:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Transl Stroke Res. 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1007/s12975-024-01314-0.
2
The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2024 指南:加强外科手术中队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究的报告。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3151-3165. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001268.
3
Safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet drugs for stent-assisted embolization on risk of stroke and prognosis in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: One center results of CIAP-5 clinical trial.
双重抗血小板药物用于颅内破裂动脉瘤患者支架辅助栓塞术预防卒中风险及预后的安全性和有效性:CIAP-5临床试验的单中心结果
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jan 8:15910199231219212. doi: 10.1177/15910199231219212.
4
Predictors of Perioperative Complications During Leo Baby Stent Treatment for Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Leo婴儿支架治疗急性破裂颅内动脉瘤围手术期并发症的预测因素:一项回顾性多中心研究
Neurosurgery. 2023 Dec 4. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002780.
5
Safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in the acute phase of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a propensity score-matched study.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血急性期双联抗血小板治疗的安全性:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Oct;55(4):E10. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.FOCUS23376.
6
Does dual antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of haematoma enlargement in the acute stage? A retrospective study of the use of stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone or balloon-assisted coiling for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms combined with intracranial haematoma.双重抗血小板治疗会增加急性阶段血肿扩大的风险吗?支架辅助弹簧圈治疗与单纯弹簧圈治疗或球囊辅助弹簧圈治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤合并颅内血肿的回顾性研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Jun 2;46(1):133. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02036-x.
7
2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2023 颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会指南
Stroke. 2023 Jul;54(7):e314-e370. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000436. Epub 2023 May 22.
8
Coiling Variations for Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Comaneci-, Stent-, and Balloon-Coiling Assistance Techniques.颅内破裂动脉瘤的线圈变异治疗:Comaneci、支架和球囊辅助线圈技术的荟萃分析比较。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e1324-e1340. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 9.
9
Tailored antiplatelet therapy in stent assisted coiling for unruptured aneurysms: a nationwide registry study.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗未破裂动脉瘤的个体化抗血小板治疗:一项全国性登记研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):1095-1104. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019571. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Predictors of thromboembolic complications after stent-assisted coiling of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective multicenter study.急性破裂颅内动脉瘤支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后血栓栓塞性并发症的预测因素:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 3;9:922858. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.922858. eCollection 2022.