Ekemen Suheyla, Bilir Ebru, Soultan Hagar Elsayed Akram, Zafar Sadia, Demir Figen, Tabandeh Babek, Toprak Sadik, Yapicier Ozlem, Coban Cevayir
Vocational School of Health Services, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Division of Malaria Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Science (IMSUT), the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024 Jan 3;16:1-13. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S444077. eCollection 2024.
Breast cancers exhibit molecular heterogeneity, leading to diverse clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-L1 have shown promise in various malignancies, including breast cancer. Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) has also been associated with tumor aggressiveness and prognostic potential in breast cancers. However, the expression of PD-L1 and LCN2 in breast cancer subtypes and their prognostic implications remains poorly investigated.
A retrospective analysis of 89 primary breast cancer cases was conducted to assess PD-L1 and LCN2 expressions using immunohistochemistry. Cases were classified into four different molecular subtypes based on ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 status. Associations between PD-L1 and LCN2 expressions and various prognostic factors were examined.
Although low expression of LCN2 (Allred score of <3) was observed even in normal breast tissue, LCN2 expression with increasing Allred score (≥3) positively correlated with the histological grade, high Ki-67 proliferation index, and ER/PR negativity. Significant elevations of LCN2 and PD-L1 expressions were observed in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers.
The results of the study highlight the association of LCN2 with known prognostic factors and molecular subtypes. To identify potential immunotherapy recipients, it would be useful to evaluate LCN2 as well as PD-L1 immune targets in different subgroups of breast cancer patients. Further studies with larger patient numbers are warranted to validate these observations and establish standardized scoring criteria for LCN2 expression assessment.
乳腺癌表现出分子异质性,导致不同的临床结果和治疗反应。靶向程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)的免疫检查点抑制剂在包括乳腺癌在内的各种恶性肿瘤中已显示出应用前景。脂质运载蛋白2(LCN2)也与乳腺癌的肿瘤侵袭性和预后潜力相关。然而,PD-L1和LCN2在乳腺癌亚型中的表达及其预后意义仍研究不足。
对89例原发性乳腺癌病例进行回顾性分析,采用免疫组织化学法评估PD-L1和LCN2的表达。根据雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)和Ki-67状态将病例分为四种不同的分子亚型。检测PD-L1和LCN2表达与各种预后因素之间的关联。
尽管在正常乳腺组织中也观察到LCN2低表达(Allred评分<3),但随着Allred评分增加(≥3),LCN2表达与组织学分级、高Ki-67增殖指数以及ER/PR阴性呈正相关。在三阴性和HER2阳性乳腺癌中观察到LCN2和PD-L1表达显著升高。
该研究结果突出了LCN2与已知预后因素和分子亚型的关联。为了识别潜在的免疫治疗接受者,评估乳腺癌患者不同亚组中的LCN2以及PD-L1免疫靶点将是有用的。需要更多患者的进一步研究来验证这些观察结果,并建立LCN2表达评估的标准化评分标准。