Suppr超能文献

肾移植急性排斥反应的尿细胞基因特征

Urinary Cell Gene Signature of Acute Rejection in Kidney Allografts.

作者信息

Salinas Thalia, Li Carol, Snopkowski Catherine, Sharma Vijay K, Dadhania Darshana M, Suhre Karsten, Muthukumar Thangamani, Suthanthiran Manikkam

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Dec 19:2023.12.18.23300165. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.18.23300165.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A kidney allograft biopsy may display acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (MR). Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of all three types of acute rejection is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.

METHODS

We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy number in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients and calculated urinary cell three-gene signature score from log -transformed values for the 18S-normalized CD3E mRNA, 18S-normalized CXCL10 mRNA and 18S rRNA. We determined whether the signature score in biopsy-matched urine specimens discriminates biopsies without rejection (NR, n=50) from biopsies displaying TCMR (n=47), ABMR (n=28) or MR (n=20).

RESULTS

Urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated TCMR, ABMR or MR biopsies from NR biopsies (P <0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded P<0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; P <0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and P <0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (P<0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (P<0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (P<0.0001). All three rejection biopsy categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Urinary cell three-gene signature score may serve as a universal diagnostic signature of acute rejection due to TCMR, ABMR or MR in human kidney allografts with similar performance characteristics.

摘要

引言

肾移植活检可能显示急性T细胞介导的排斥反应(TCMR)、抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)或同时存在的TCMR + ABMR(MR)。开发可诊断所有三种类型急性排斥反应的非侵入性生物标志物是诊断手段的有益补充。

方法

我们开发了定制的逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)检测方法,并测量了126例肾移植受者的145份活检匹配尿液样本中的尿细胞mRNA拷贝数,并根据18S标准化的CD3E mRNA、18S标准化的CXCL10 mRNA和18S核糖体RNA的对数转换值计算尿细胞三基因特征评分。我们确定活检匹配尿液标本中的特征评分是否能区分无排斥反应的活检(NR,n = 50)与显示TCMR(n = 47)、ABMR(n = 28)或MR(n = 20)的活检。

结果

尿细胞三基因特征可区分TCMR、ABMR或MR活检与NR活检(单向方差分析,P < 0.0001)。Dunnett多重比较检验显示,NR与TCMR比较,P < 0.0001;NR与ABMR比较,P < 0.001;NR与MR比较,P < 0.0001。通过自助重采样,对于NR与TCMR,接受者操作特征曲线(AUC)的乐观校正面积为0.749(偏差校正95%置信区间[CI],0.638至0.840)(P < 0.0001);对于NR与ABMR,为0.780(95%CI,0.656至0.878)(P < 0.0001);对于NR与MR,为0.857(95%CI,0.727至0.947)(P < 0.0001)。所有三种排斥活检类别与NR活检的区分准确率相似(所有AUC比较,P > 0.05)。

结论

尿细胞三基因特征评分可作为人类肾移植中由TCMR、ABMR或MR引起的急性排斥反应的通用诊断特征,具有相似的性能特征。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验