• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后靶病变血运重建对长期死亡率的影响。

Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Disease.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Division of Biostatics, Center for Medical Research and Information, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 8;17(1):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.068.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.068
PMID:38199751
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although target lesion revascularization (TLR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is not rare, its timing of occurrence and prognostic impact on long-term mortality is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate TLR incidence over time and its impact on mortality after PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) for LMCA disease.

METHODS

Using a pooled data from 4 multicenter observational registries (IRIS-DES [Interventional Cardiology Research Incorporation Society-Drug-Eluting Stents], IRIS-MAIN [Interventional Cardiology Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization], MAIN-COMPARE [Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization], and PRECOMBAT [PREmier of Randomized COMparison of Bypass Surgery versus AngioplasTy Using Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease]), we evaluated 1,397 patients with LMCA disease treated with DES and available long-term mortality data. The association between TLR and the 10-year risk of mortality was examined by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with TLR as a time-varying covariate.

RESULTS

During maximum follow-up of 10 years (median 6.8 years), TLR occurred in 118 patients and its 10-year cumulative incidence was 10.8%. TLR mostly occurred within 2 years after initial PCI and decreased over time: early-stage TLR (within 2 years) in 73 (61.9%) patients and late-stage TLR (beyond 2 years) in 45 (38.1%) patients. Among all TLR patients, 23 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and 95 underwent repeat PCI. In the time-varying multivariable Cox model, the presence of TLR was not significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.50-1.63; P = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of ischemia-driven TLR was mostly common within 2 years after left main PCI, TLR occurred steadily during the 10-year follow-up period. However, given that such patients were optimally revascularized, the prognostic impact of TLR on mortality was not substantial. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133; Observational Study for Left Main Disease Treatment [IRIS-MAIN]; NCT01341327; Ten-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [MAIN COMPARE]; NCT02791412; Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [PRECOMBAT]; NCT00422968).

摘要

背景

尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病后的靶病变血运重建(TLR)并不罕见,但它的发生时间及其对长期死亡率的预后影响尚不确定。

目的

本研究旨在探讨经药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗 LMCA 疾病后 TLR 的发生率及其对死亡率的影响随时间的变化。

方法

利用来自 4 个多中心观察性注册研究(IRIS-DES[介入心脏病学研究协会-药物洗脱支架]、IRIS-MAIN[介入心脏病学研究协会-左主干再血管化]、MAIN-COMPARE[未保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的血运重建:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的随机比较]和 PRECOMBAT[左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中使用药物洗脱支架的旁路手术与血管成形术的 PREmier 随机比较])的数据,我们评估了 1397 例接受 DES 治疗的 LMCA 疾病患者,并获得了长期死亡率数据。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析 TLR 与 10 年死亡率风险之间的关系,将 TLR 作为随时间变化的协变量。

结果

在最长 10 年的随访期间(中位随访时间 6.8 年),118 例患者发生 TLR,其 10 年累积发生率为 10.8%。TLR 主要发生在初始 PCI 后 2 年内,并随时间逐渐减少:早期 TLR(2 年内)73 例(61.9%),晚期 TLR(2 年后)45 例(38.1%)。在所有 TLR 患者中,23 例患者接受了冠状动脉旁路移植术,95 例患者接受了重复 PCI。在时间变化的多变量 Cox 模型中,TLR 的存在与死亡率增加无显著相关性(调整后的 HR:0.90;95%CI:0.50-1.63;P=0.73)。

结论

尽管左主干 PCI 后缺血驱动的 TLR 发生率主要在 2 年内较高,但在 10 年随访期间 TLR 仍持续发生。然而,鉴于这些患者得到了最佳的血运重建,TLR 对死亡率的预后影响并不显著。(常规临床实践中第一代、第二代和新药洗脱支架的评估 [IRIS-DES];NCT01186133;左主干疾病治疗的观察性研究 [IRIS-MAIN];NCT01341327;药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的 10 年结果 [MAIN COMPARE];NCT02791412;左主干冠状动脉疾病患者使用西罗莫司洗脱支架的旁路手术与血管成形术 [PRECOMBAT];NCT00422968)。

相似文献

1
Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Disease.左主干病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后靶病变血运重建对长期死亡率的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 8;17(1):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.068.
2
Percutaneous intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉狭窄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 21;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0853-1.
3
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Clinical outcomes of dialysis patients after implantation of DES: meta analysis and systematic review of literature.药物洗脱支架植入术后透析患者的临床结局:文献的荟萃分析与系统评价
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Jun;57(3):291-7.
5
Drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and economic evaluation.药物洗脱支架:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(46):iii, xi-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11460.
6
Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.冠状动脉支架:一项快速系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta8350.
7
Stepwise Provisional Versus Systematic Dual-Stent Strategies for Treatment of True Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.治疗真性左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的逐步临时与系统性双支架策略
Circulation. 2025 Mar 4;151(9):612-622. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071153. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Recurrent Revascularization at 10 Years After Percutaneous Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis.药物洗脱支架再狭窄经皮治疗 10 年后的再次血运重建。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 8;17(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.031. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stents (Xience V): systematic review and direct-indirect comparison meta-analyses with paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus) and sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher).依维莫司洗脱支架(Xience V)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:与紫杉醇洗脱支架(Taxus)和西罗莫司洗脱支架(Cypher)的系统评价及直接-间接比较的荟萃分析
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Feb;56(1):55-65.
10
Comparing Stent Thrombosis associated with Zotarolimus Eluting Stents versus Everolimus Eluting Stents at 1 year follow up: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials.1年随访期内佐他莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架相关的支架内血栓形成比较:6项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0515-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Outcome of Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-An 8-Year Single-Tertiary-Care-Center Experience.非保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期预后——一项单三级医疗中心的8年经验
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):316. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070316.