Suppr超能文献

移植后患者利尿剂的使用:回顾性图表分析。

Diuretic Use in Post-Kidney Transplant Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California.

Soo Min Jang, PharmD, Proacture Consulting Group, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2024 Jan-Feb;56(1):82-86. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.11.024. Epub 2024 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) significantly enhances the possibility of both acute and chronic rejection of the transplanted organ, thereby reducing patient quality of life and survival rates. To prevent and manage oliguria in renal transplant patients, loop diuretics are presently commonly used. In our study, we assessed the possible impact of furosemide on the incidence of DGF among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A review of medical records was conducted to examine demographic characteristics and kidney transplant outcomes in an adult (older than 18 years old) population. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), whereas the secondary objective was to compare the creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at day 30 and day 90 post-transplantation in patients who were administered furosemide vs those who were not.

RESULTS

This study included 330 patients who underwent kidney transplantation. Furosemide was administered to 169 (51.3%), whereas 161(48.7%) patients did not receive continued dose of diuretic postoperatively. The rate of DGF was significantly higher in patients who received furosemide than in those who did not (furosemide 44% vs 4%; P < .001). The eGFR was lower in the furosemide group compared to the no furosemide group at day 30 (56 ± 24 vs 71 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m, P < .001) and day 90 (66 ± 27 vs 78 ± 25 mL/min/1.73 m, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that there is no benefit in treating an oliguric AKI with furosemide. Administration of furosemide, especially in high doses, may increase the risk of toxicity, delay dialysis, and increase the length of stay.

摘要

背景

延迟移植物功能(DGF)的发生显著增加了移植器官发生急性和慢性排斥的可能性,从而降低了患者的生活质量和存活率。为了预防和管理肾移植患者的少尿症,目前通常使用袢利尿剂。在我们的研究中,我们评估了呋塞米对肾移植受者 DGF 发生率的可能影响。

方法

对成人(18 岁以上)人群的病历进行了回顾,以检查人口统计学特征和肾移植结果。主要目的是确定延迟移植物功能(DGF)的发生率,次要目的是比较接受呋塞米治疗和未接受呋塞米治疗的患者在移植后第 30 天和第 90 天的肌酐水平和估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。

结果

本研究共纳入 330 例接受肾移植的患者。169 例(51.3%)患者接受呋塞米治疗,161 例(48.7%)患者术后未继续使用利尿剂。接受呋塞米治疗的患者 DGF 发生率明显高于未接受呋塞米治疗的患者(呋塞米组 44% vs 非呋塞米组 4%;P <.001)。与非呋塞米组相比,呋塞米组在第 30 天(56 ± 24 与 71 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m,P <.001)和第 90 天(66 ± 27 与 78 ± 25 mL/min/1.73 m,P <.001)的 eGFR 较低。

结论

我们的结果表明,用呋塞米治疗少尿性急性肾损伤没有好处。使用呋塞米,特别是大剂量,可能会增加毒性风险、延迟透析并延长住院时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验