• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腋动脉第一段经皮穿刺入路行 Impella 支持下的 PCI 与 TAVR 的比较。

Percutaneous transaxillary approach through the first segment of the axillary artery for the Impella-supported PCI Versus TAVR.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.

Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):1016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51552-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-51552-3
PMID:38200136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10781673/
Abstract

Percutaneous transaxillary approach (PTAX) through the first segment of the axillary artery is not widely recognized as a safe method. Furthermore, PTAX has never been directly compared between Impella-supported percutaneous coronary interventions (Impella-PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of PTAX through the first axillary segment in Impella-PCI versus TAVR. In cases where standard imaging guidance was insufficient, a technique involving puncturing the axillary artery "on-the-balloon" was employed. The endpoints were bleeding and vascular complications, as defined by BARC and VARC-3 criteria. PTAX was successfully performed in all 46 attempted cases: 23 for Impella-PCI and 23 for TAVR. Strict adherence to BARC and VARC-3 criteria led to the frequent identification of major bleeding (57%) and a moderately frequent diagnosis of vascular complications (17%). These incidences were primarily based on post-procedural hemoglobin reduction (> 3 g/dl) but not overt bleeding. The Impella group exhibited a higher rate of BARC 3b bleeding due to a greater hemoglobin decline resulting from the prolonged implant duration and PCI itself. Left axillary access was linked to smaller blood loss. Bleeding and vascular complications, as per BARC and VARC-3 definitions, did not affect short-term prognosis, with only 3 Impella patients succumbing to heart failure unrelated to the procedures during one-month follow-up period.

摘要

经腋动脉第一段行经皮穿刺(PTAX)并未被广泛认为是一种安全的方法。此外,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中使用 Impella 支持与经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)之间从未直接比较过 PTAX。本研究评估了在 Impella-PCI 与 TAVR 中经腋动脉第一段行 PTAX 的可行性和安全性。在标准影像引导不足的情况下,采用了一种在“球囊上”穿刺腋动脉的技术。终点是根据 BARC 和 VARC-3 标准定义的出血和血管并发症。在所有 46 例尝试的病例中均成功进行了 PTAX:23 例用于 Impella-PCI,23 例用于 TAVR。严格遵守 BARC 和 VARC-3 标准导致主要出血(57%)和中等频率的血管并发症(17%)的频繁诊断。这些发生率主要基于术后血红蛋白降低(>3g/dl),而不是明显出血。由于植入时间延长和 PCI 本身导致血红蛋白下降更大,Impella 组的 BARC 3b 出血发生率更高。左腋动脉入路与出血量较小相关。根据 BARC 和 VARC-3 定义的出血和血管并发症并未影响短期预后,只有 3 例 Impella 患者在一个月的随访期间因与手术无关的心衰而死亡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/10781673/3afe8e3b69b1/41598_2024_51552_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/10781673/d843b4a60aa5/41598_2024_51552_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/10781673/b41aad734724/41598_2024_51552_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/10781673/3afe8e3b69b1/41598_2024_51552_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/10781673/d843b4a60aa5/41598_2024_51552_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/10781673/b41aad734724/41598_2024_51552_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/10781673/3afe8e3b69b1/41598_2024_51552_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous transaxillary approach through the first segment of the axillary artery for the Impella-supported PCI Versus TAVR.经腋动脉第一段经皮穿刺入路行 Impella 支持下的 PCI 与 TAVR 的比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):1016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51552-3.
2
Percutaneous large-bore axillary access is a safe alternative to surgical approach: A systematic review.经皮大口径腋路入路是一种安全的替代手术入路的方法:系统评价。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1481-1488. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29273. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
3
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Followed by Impella®-Assisted Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis as a Bridge to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.球囊主动脉瓣成形术联合 Impella®辅助下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的应用:作为经导管主动脉瓣置换术的桥接治疗。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Jan;22:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Percutaneous trans-axilla transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经腋入路经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Oct;37(10):1801-1807. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02082-3. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Impella-Assisted High-Risk PCI Before TAVR in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.在严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,经皮主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)前使用Impella辅助进行高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的可行性和安全性。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jun 29;2(5):101061. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101061. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
6
Application of Impella Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty: A Single-Center Experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术和球囊主动脉瓣成形术中 Impella 机械循环支持装置的应用:单中心经验。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Aug;53:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
7
Short- and Mid-Term Outcomes of Complex and High-Risk Versus Standard Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中复杂高危与标准经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期和中期结局。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2023 Feb;35(2):E92-E98. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00254. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
8
Axillary Artery Pseudoaneurysm Following Percutaneous Transaxillary Access for Impella Device Placement During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间经皮经腋动脉途径置入Impella装置后腋动脉假性动脉瘤
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Jun 17;2(6):907-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.05.005. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty With Same-Setting Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the TAVR Era: A Case Series.经导管主动脉瓣置换术同期行复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的球囊主动脉瓣成形术:病例系列。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Jun;33(6):E479-E482. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00532. Epub 2021 May 20.
10
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Complex Calcific Coronary Lesions Utilizing Orbital Atherectomy Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经皮冠状动脉介入术治疗复杂钙化冠状动脉病变,在经导管主动脉瓣置换术之前使用轨道旋磨术。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Apr;37:82-85. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.117. Epub 2021 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
SCAI Position Statement on Best Practices for Percutaneous Axillary Arterial Access and Training.SCAI关于经皮腋动脉穿刺通路及培训最佳实践的立场声明。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 19;1(3):100041. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100041. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
2
Management of Bleeding and Hemolysis During Percutaneous Microaxial Flow Pump Support: A Practical Approach.经皮微轴流泵支持治疗期间出血和溶血的管理:一种实用方法。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 24;16(14):1707-1720. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.043.
3
Vascular Access in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing TAVR: The Hostile Registry.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者外周动脉疾病血管通路:敌意登记。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Feb 27;16(4):396-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.12.009. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
4
Simple Method How to Avoid Stenting in Complicated Percutaneous Transaxillary Access.在复杂的经皮腋路穿刺中避免置入支架的简单方法。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep 26;15(18):e201-e202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.07.029. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
Percutaneous vs. surgical axillary access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the TAXI registry.经皮与外科腋窝入路行经导管主动脉瓣植入术:TAXI 注册研究。
Panminerva Med. 2022 Dec;64(4):427-437. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.22.04750-4. Epub 2022 May 30.
6
Transcaval Versus Transaxillary TAVR in Contemporary Practice: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis.经腔静脉入路与经锁骨下入路 TAVR 在当代实践中的比较:倾向评分加权分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May 9;15(9):965-975. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.03.014.
7
Percutaneous versus surgical transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched analysis of the US experience.经皮与经胸入路经导管主动脉瓣置换术:美国经验的倾向评分匹配分析。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Apr 22;17(18):1514-1522. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00549.
8
Percutaneous transaxillary access for endovascular aortic procedures in the multicenter international PAXA registry.经皮经腋入路在多中心国际 PAXA 注册研究中的血管内主动脉操作应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):868-876.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.089. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Renal protection of transaxillary/subclavian accesses for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with impossible femoral access.经腋/锁骨入路行经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗股动脉入路不可能的患者的肾脏保护。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2021 Oct;55(5):297-299. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2021.1970802. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
10
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3 期:主动脉瓣临床研究更新的终点定义。
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.