Collett T S
J Comp Physiol A. 1987 Jan;160(1):109-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00613446.
Gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) can specify the location of a goal by means of visual landmarks and will return to such a goal from different starting positions in the vicinity of the landmarks. To discover whether landmark-cues are used continuously during an approach to the goal, gerbils were trained to forage for sunflower seeds close to a single illuminated light-bulb on the floor of an arena. As they approached the bulb, it was switched off and another bulb in a variable position with respect to the first turned on. On 52 out of 71 trials the gerbils changed their trajectory (latency ca. 240 ms) to aim for the newly lit bulb (Fig. 1 A, B). On the remaining trials, gerbils maintained their original course towards the first bulb as though it were still lit and then paused after a longer delay before eventually changing direction (Fig. 1 C). Thus, an approach to a beacon is usually under continuous visual control. This ensures that the gerbil will reach its goal correctly despite any inaccuracies in its initial computation of its approach. When switches were made between more complex arrays of landmarks, the gerbils' behaviour was less clear-cut. Possible reasons for this difference are suggested.
沙鼠(长爪沙鼠)能够通过视觉地标确定目标位置,并会从地标附近的不同起始位置返回该目标。为了探究在地标接近目标的过程中是否持续使用地标线索,研究人员训练沙鼠在竞技场地面靠近单个点亮的灯泡处觅食葵花籽。当它们接近灯泡时,灯泡会关闭,另一个相对于第一个灯泡位置可变的灯泡会亮起。在71次试验中的52次试验中,沙鼠改变了它们的轨迹(延迟约240毫秒),以瞄准新点亮的灯泡(图1A、B)。在其余的试验中,沙鼠保持朝着第一个灯泡的原始路线,就好像它仍然亮着一样,然后在更长的延迟后停顿,最终才改变方向(图1C)。因此,向信标的接近通常处于持续的视觉控制之下。这确保了沙鼠尽管在接近目标的初始计算中存在任何不准确之处,仍能正确到达目标。当地标更复杂的阵列之间进行切换时,沙鼠的行为就不那么明确了。文中提出了造成这种差异的可能原因。