Abdullaeva Umida, Pape Bernd, Hirvonen Jussi
Department of Radiology, Tashkent City Branch of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Oncology and Radiology, Tashkent 100054, Uzbekistan.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20521 Turku, Finland.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;14(1):113. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010113.
The purpose of this study was to review the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting perineural spreading (PNS) of head and neck tumors using histopathological or surgical evidence from the afflicted nerve as the reference standard. Previous studies in the English language published in the last 30 years were searched from PubMed and Embase databases. We included studies that used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (with and without contrast enhancement) to detect PNS, as well as the histological or surgical confirmation of PNS, and that reported the exact numbers of patients required for assessing diagnostic accuracy. The outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Heterogeneity was assessed with the Higgins inconsistency test (I). P-values smaller than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 11 retrospective studies were found, reporting 319 nerve samples from 245 patients. Meta-analytic estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were as follows: sensitivity 0.85 (0.70-0.95), specificity 0.85 (0.80-0.89), PPV 0.86 (0.70-0.94), and NPV 0.85 (0.71-0.93). We found statistically significant heterogeneity for sensitivity (I = 72%, = 0.003) and PPV (I = 70%, = 0.038), but not for NPV (I = 65%, = 0.119) or specificity (I = 12%, = 0.842). The most frequent MRI features of PNS were nerve enlargement and enhancement. Squamous cell carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma were the most common tumor types, and the facial and trigeminal nerves were the most commonly affected nerves in PNS. Only a few studies provided examples of false MRI diagnoses. MRI demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in depicting PNS of cranial nerves, yet this statement was based on scarce and heterogeneous evidence.
本研究的目的是,以受累神经的组织病理学或手术证据作为参考标准,回顾磁共振成像(MRI)检测头颈部肿瘤神经周围扩散(PNS)的诊断准确性。从PubMed和Embase数据库检索过去30年发表的英文既往研究。我们纳入了使用磁共振成像(MRI)(有或无对比增强)检测PNS以及PNS的组织学或手术确认的研究,并且报告了评估诊断准确性所需的患者确切数量。结局指标为灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。采用Higgins不一致性检验(I)评估异质性。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。共找到11项回顾性研究,报告了来自245例患者的319个神经样本。荟萃分析估计值及其95%置信区间如下:灵敏度0.85(0.70 - 0.95),特异度0.85(0.80 - 0.89),PPV 0.86(0.70 - 0.94),NPV 0.85(0.71 - 0.93)。我们发现灵敏度(I = 72%,P = 0.003)和PPV(I = 70%,P = 0.038)存在统计学显著异质性,但NPV(I = 65%,P = 0.119)或特异度(I = 12%,P = 0.842)不存在。PNS最常见的MRI特征是神经增粗和强化。鳞状细胞癌和腺样囊性癌是最常见的肿瘤类型,面神经和三叉神经是PNS中最常受累神经。只有少数研究提供了MRI假诊断的例子。MRI在描绘颅神经PNS方面显示出较高的诊断准确性,但这一说法基于稀少且异质性的证据。