Suppr超能文献

术中高呼气末正压滴定至最低驱动压(ΔP)的安全性和可行性——DESIGNATION研究的中期分析

Safety and Feasibility of Intraoperative High PEEP Titrated to the Lowest Driving Pressure (ΔP)-Interim Analysis of DESIGNATION.

作者信息

Nijbroek Sunny G L H, Hol Liselotte, Serpa Neto Ary, van Meenen David M P, Hemmes Sabrine N T, Hollmann Markus W, Schultz Marcus J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 29;13(1):209. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010209.

Abstract

Uncertainty remains about the best level of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). An ongoing RCT ('DESIGNATION') compares an 'individualized high PEEP' strategy ('iPEEP')-titrated to the lowest driving pressure (ΔP) with recruitment maneuvers (RM), with a 'standard low PEEP' strategy ('low PEEP')-using 5 cm HO without RMs with respect to the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. This report is an interim analysis of safety and feasibility. From September 2018 to July 2022, we enrolled 743 patients. Data of 698 patients were available for this analysis. Hypotension occurred more often in 'iPEEP' vs. 'low PEEP' (54.7 vs. 44.1%; RR, 1.24 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.44); < 0.01). Investigators were compliant with the study protocol 285/344 patients (82.8%) in 'iPEEP', and 345/354 patients (97.5%) in 'low PEEP' ( < 0.01). Most frequent protocol violation was missing the final RM at the end of anesthesia before extubation; PEEP titration was performed in 99.4 vs. 0%; PEEP was set correctly in 89.8 vs. 98.9%. Compared to 'low PEEP', the 'iPEEP' group was ventilated with higher PEEP (10.0 (8.0-12.0) vs. 5.0 (5.0-5.0) cm HO; < 0.01). Thus, in patients undergoing general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery, an individualized high PEEP ventilation strategy is associated with hypotension. The protocol is feasible and results in clear contrast in PEEP. DESIGNATION is expected to finish in late 2023.

摘要

术中最佳呼气末正压(PEEP)水平仍存在不确定性。一项正在进行的随机对照试验(“指定”)比较了一种“个体化高PEEP”策略(“iPEEP”)——通过肺复张手法(RM)滴定至最低驱动压(ΔP),与一种“标准低PEEP”策略(“低PEEP”)——不使用RM且PEEP为5 cmH₂O,比较两者术后肺部并发症的发生率。本报告是对安全性和可行性的中期分析。从2018年9月至2022年7月,我们纳入了743例患者。本分析可获取698例患者的数据。“iPEEP”组低血压发生率高于“低PEEP”组(54.7%对44.1%;相对危险度,1.24(95%置信区间1.07至1.44);P<0.01)。在“iPEEP”组,344例患者中有285例(82.8%)研究者遵守研究方案,在“低PEEP”组,354例患者中有345例(97.5%)遵守研究方案(P<0.01)。最常见的方案违背是在拔管前麻醉结束时未进行最后的肺复张手法;进行PEEP滴定的比例分别为99.4%对0%;PEEP设置正确的比例分别为89.8%对98.9%。与“低PEEP”相比,“iPEEP”组通气时的PEEP更高(10.0(8.0 - 12.0)对5.0(5.0 - 5.0)cmH₂O;P<0.01)。因此,在接受开腹手术全身麻醉的患者中,个体化高PEEP通气策略与低血压相关。该方案可行,且能使PEEP产生明显差异。“指定”试验预计于2023年末完成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85bc/10780246/8855a6b543a9/jcm-13-00209-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验